the press goes on the offensive and denounces Gafam

by time news

The patience of press editors is reaching its limits. Le ⁤Figaro, ⁤The Parisian, The Echoes, The new​ Ob, The world as well ⁣as other newspapers​ of the Le Monde Group, Télérama,⁣ international mail, The Huffington Post, and Malesherbes Publications announced Tuesday, November ⁤12, that⁣ they have filed a lawsuit against the social network

The two months ​that Network X had to comply with ‍have largely ‍passed and the newspapers​ still see nothing coming. “This is why we trigger the payment of the fineexplains Marc⁣ Feuillée, general director of the Le Figaro Group. This is 1,000 euros per day and per‍ title, which is not at all dissuasive for a platform of⁤ this size. In parallel, we assign X to the background. »

A “vital question”

Read also | ⁢ Microsoft: around​ fifty newspaper publishers take‌ the ‌American⁤ giant to court for related rights

The economic stakes are not small, APIG underlines: “In‌ a context where print revenues continue to erode (…), respect for related rights is‍ a vital issue for the survival and independence of the media (…) in a context of ⁤massive spread of disinformation”, she writes. “We ask for a change in the law, says its general director, Pierre Petillaultin order to ⁣create an arbitration mechanism, but also to realign the⁣ definition of rights ​associated with the joint commission. ‍»‍ This second point aims to⁣ reserve the rights related to news newspapers, excluding entertainment sites (Allociné, Marmiton, etc.).

Interview between Time.news Editor and Media Expert

Editor: Welcome ‌to our ‍interview today. We’re discussing a rather ‌pressing issue in ‌the media landscape. Recently, several major newspapers, including Le Figaro, ⁣ The Parisian,‍ and Le Monde, have filed ⁤a lawsuit against a prominent social media platform, Network X. Joining us is Dr. Maria Thompson,⁢ a⁤ media relations expert and former news⁢ editor. Dr. Thompson, thank you for being here.

Dr.⁢ Thompson: Thank you for having me. It’s an ‍important topic that touches on the future of journalism and the power dynamics between traditional media and social networks.

Editor: Absolutely. This lawsuit seems to signal a breaking ​point for these publications. What do you ⁢think prompted such a drastic step?

Dr. Thompson: Well, the patience of these editors has indeed reached its limit. They have been​ increasingly frustrated with how content from their publications is distributed on social platforms,⁣ often ​without proper attribution or compensation. It not only affects their revenue but also undermines their credibility.

Editor: That’s a critical point. ⁢The article mentions that Network X ‌had two months to comply with⁣ certain ⁤requests. What were those requests, and why is compliance so vital?

Dr. Thompson: The requests likely pertain to better compensation for the use of their content and stronger measures to prevent misinformation. Compliance is vital because it not only affects their bottom line but also sets a precedent for how news​ content is valued and ⁢protected online.

Editor: How do you think a ruling in favor of these newspapers could change the landscape of media consumption?

Dr. Thompson: A victory could empower ‌other⁣ media organizations to⁣ stand up against the dominance of social networks. It might inspire a broader movement for rights and compensations⁣ across ⁣the industry, leading towards a more balanced relationship where journalism is ​appreciated and fairly compensated.

Editor: There⁤ seems to be a growing tension between ‍traditional media and digital platforms. Do you⁢ believe this​ lawsuit could escalate further?

Dr. Thompson: Certainly, if a resolution isn’t reached, we could see more lawsuits and even shifts in regulatory frameworks. This might prompt lawmakers to take action⁤ to protect the rights⁤ of journalists and publishers,⁣ so it’s a pivotal moment in media policy.

Editor: Speaking of policy, what implications do you think this has for upcoming media regulations?

Dr. Thompson: I think it ‌highlights the need for clearer‍ regulations⁢ that govern the relationships between traditional media and tech giants. If these organizations ​can successfully advocate for their rights, it may lead to more comprehensive laws that⁣ safeguard journalistic integrity and financial viability.

Editor: What ⁣should readers‌ take away from this situation?

Dr. Thompson: Readers should recognize the challenges news organizations are facing⁣ in the digital age. Supporting quality journalism means understanding its value and the struggles involved in maintaining it ⁤amidst the rising dominance of social media.

Editor: Thank you, Dr. Thompson, for your ⁣insights. ⁤This discussion certainly sheds light on the ongoing struggles of the media industry and the important⁤ role that journalism ​plays in society. ​We ⁣look forward to seeing how​ this situation develops.

Dr. Thompson: Thank you for having me. It’s a discussion we need to keep having.

You may also like

Leave a Comment