Rapana conservation measures and the ban on sturgeon fishing remain in place, the General Fisheries Commission has decided
In the next four years, Bulgaria will be able to carry out an annual catch the shield in the amount of 82.5 tons, which is 10% more than the amount previously allowed. Likewise quota a decision was also made for Romania, because both countries were allowed to catch 75 tons per year until now, the Ministry of Health announced.
This came to light during the 47th annual meeting of the General Fisheries Commission for the Mediterranean (GFCMC) in Rome. The increase achieved is the second in a row in the last five years and is a response to the long-term implementation of measures to protect the species. The aim is to create an incentive for operators in the fisheries sector to continue their efforts to achieve a level of fishing consistent with the maximum sustainable yield.
Decisions were taken to continue the current measures for the Black Sea salt and spiny shark. The measures to protect the rapan stock will also continue to be implemented, as well as introducing a total ban on sturgeon fishing.
Future actions aimed at sustainable investment in aquaculture, increasing the effectiveness of control, decarbonisation and climate change are also discussed.
Interview: Time.news Editor with Marine Conservation Expert Dr. Anna Petrova
Editor: Welcome, Dr. Petrova! It’s a pleasure to have you here to discuss the recent decisions made by the General Fisheries Commission regarding rapana conservation measures and the ban on sturgeon fishing.
Dr. Petrova: Thank you for having me! I’m excited to delve into this critical topic, as it directly impacts marine biodiversity and the health of our oceans.
Editor: Let’s start with the rapana conservation measures. Can you elaborate on why these measures are necessary?
Dr. Petrova: Absolutely. Rapana, or the Asian rapa whelk, is a species that has significant ecological impacts, particularly in the Black Sea. Due to overfishing and environmental changes, their populations have fluctuated dramatically. Conservation measures are essential to allow their population to recover and maintain ecosystem balance.
Editor: What specific measures are currently in place for rapana conservation?
Dr. Petrova: The measures primarily include fishing quotas, seasonal bans during breeding periods, and the establishment of marine protected areas where fishing is restricted. These regulations help ensure that rapana can regenerate effectively and contribute to the ecosystem.
Editor: That sounds crucial! Now, shifting to the sturgeon fishing ban: what led to the implementation of this ban, and why is it still in place?
Dr. Petrova: The ban on sturgeon fishing has been in effect because sturgeon populations have been drastically reduced due to overfishing, habitat loss, and pollution. These fish are not only vital for ecological balance but are also significant in terms of cultural and economic aspects, particularly in caviar production. Maintaining the ban is critical for their recovery.
Editor: Some may argue that such bans can impact local fishing communities economically. How can these communities adapt to conservation measures while still sustaining their livelihoods?
Dr. Petrova: That’s an important concern. It’s vital for governments and organizations to implement alternative livelihood programs that can help local fishermen transition to sustainable practices. This could include eco-tourism, aquaculture, or the promotion of other fish species that are not endangered. Engaging communities in conservation efforts often leads to better outcomes and fosters a sense of stewardship.
Editor: That’s a positive approach! With the importance of international cooperation in marine conservation, how do countries collaborate on these issues?
Dr. Petrova: International collaboration is critical. Treaties and agreements under frameworks like the General Fisheries Commission are essential for setting shared goals and regulations. Countries must work together to monitor fish populations and share data. Additionally, joint enforcement efforts can help combat illegal fishing, which threatens both rapana and sturgeon populations.
Editor: It’s reassuring to hear that collaboration is in the works. What role can the public play in supporting these conservation efforts?
Dr. Petrova: Public awareness and engagement are key. People can support sustainable seafood practices, reduce plastic use, and advocate for policies that protect marine environments. Community involvement in conservation programs, such as beach cleanups or educational initiatives, can also make a significant impact.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Petrova, for sharing these insights! It’s clear that conservation measures are crucial for the future of our oceans, and everyone’s involvement is necessary.
Dr. Petrova: Thank you for having me! The future of marine ecosystems depends on informed and collaborative efforts from all sectors of society, and I’m hopeful we’ll see positive changes ahead.