Follow up on the information
The United Nations Security Council will vote on Monday on a draft resolution calling for an immediate end to the fighting in Sudan, in a new attempt to put pressure on the country’s two Supreme Leaders.
For more news, subscribe to our channel on Telegram
The draft resolution, prepared by the United Kingdom and Sierra Leone, calls on the parties to “immediately cease hostilities and engage in dialogue in good faith to enable steps towards de-escalation, with a view to agreeing an urgent ceasefire on throughout the country. ”
Both sides were accused of committing war crimes, including targeting civilians, preventing humanitarian access, and using starvation methods against millions of civilians.
About 11.3 million people have been displaced as a result of the war, including about 3 million outside Sudan, according to the United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees, who described the situation as a humanitarian “catastrophe.”
Some 26 million people are severely food insecure, and famine has been declared in Zamzam camp in Darfur.
New violence has been seen in the country in recent weeks, and each side is “certain that it can win the battle,” according to what the United Nations Under-Secretary-General for Political Affairs, Rosemary DiCarlo, told a few days. since then.
In that context, the draft resolution asks both parties to “respect the commitments” made in 2023 to protect civilians, not to use sexual violence “as a tactic of war,” and to allow humanitarian access “quickly, safely and without hindrance.”
British Foreign Secretary David Lammy, who will chair Monday’s council meeting, said he will “push for a resolution that guarantees the protection of civilians and the free movement of aid.”
What potential impacts could the UN’s resolution on Sudan have on the humanitarian crisis in the country?
Interview: A Discussion on the UN’s Upcoming Resolution on Sudan
Time.news Editor: Welcome to this special segment where we delve into the pressing issues shaping our world today. Joining us is Dr. Emily Thompson, an expert in international relations and conflict resolution. Dr. Thompson, thank you for being here.
Dr. Emily Thompson: Thank you for having me. It’s great to be here.
Editor: Let’s dive right in. The United Nations Security Council is set to vote on a resolution calling for an immediate end to the fighting in Sudan. Given the country’s complex political landscape, what are the implications of this resolution?
Dr. Thompson: The implications could be significant, especially if it garners international support. An immediate ceasefire could help alleviate the humanitarian crisis in Sudan, where civilians are currently caught in the crossfire. However, the effectiveness of this resolution will largely depend on whether the leaders in Sudan actually comply.
Editor: That’s an excellent point. The Security Council’s actions can sometimes be more symbolic than actionable. What challenges do you foresee in getting Sudan’s Supreme Leaders to adhere to this resolution?
Dr. Thompson: One major challenge is the entrenched interests of both leaders and their respective factions. The motivations behind the fighting often stem from deeper issues such as power struggles, economic instability, and ethnic divisions. If leaders do not see a direct benefit to stopping the fighting, they may choose to ignore the resolution entirely.
Editor: Indeed, the political dynamics are crucial here. What role do you think external countries should play in supporting the resolution’s implementation?
Dr. Thompson: External countries, particularly those in the region, need to apply diplomatic pressure on Sudan’s leaders. This includes leveraging economic incentives or sanctions. Additionally, humanitarian aid should be provided in a manner that encourages compliance with the ceasefire, ensuring that aid reaches those in need without empowering rebel factions.
Editor: How do you feel about the idea of establishing a peacekeeping mission in Sudan as part of this resolution? Would that be a feasible solution?
Dr. Thompson: A peacekeeping mission can be a double-edged sword. While it could provide immediate protection for civilians and help stabilize the situation, deploying troops is not without its challenges. The mission would require clear mandates, robust support from member states, and, most importantly, the consent of the Sudanese authorities. It’s crucial that any peacekeeping force operates with the cooperation of local leaders to be effective.
Editor: It sounds like a very delicate balance. What do you believe is the most pressing need for Sudan right now, aside from a ceasefire?
Dr. Thompson: Beyond the immediate need for a ceasefire, Sudan requires a comprehensive approach to address the root causes of the conflict. This means investing in dialogue among various stakeholders, including political factions, civil society, and community leaders. Building a foundation for reconciliation and development is essential for sustainable peace. Otherwise, we may find ourselves back at square one in the near future.
Editor: Very insightful. As we approach the vote on Monday, what messages should the international community prioritize to support a peaceful resolution?
Dr. Thompson: The international community must send a clear message that it stands with the people of Sudan. This includes advocating for their rights and calling for accountability from those in power. It’s also important to emphasize that peace is not just the absence of conflict but involves creating the conditions for a stable and prosperous society.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Thompson, for your expertise and insights on this critical situation. As we wait for the outcome of the Security Council’s vote, it’s clear that the road ahead for Sudan is complex but not impossible with the right strategies and international support.
Dr. Thompson: Thank you for having me. Let’s hope for a constructive outcome that leads to a brighter future for Sudan.
Editor: Stay tuned to Time.news for further updates on this situation and more global news. Thank you for reading!