The trial of a former employee of the Russian propaganda media accused of treason begins in Estonia /

by times news cr

Svetlana Burtseva obtained⁣ Estonian citizenship in ‌1994 through naturalization. Since 2017, she has been working in the Russian propaganda conglomerate “Rossia Segodnia“, writing about the developments in Estonia. Her articles were⁣ published in various ‍online propaganda media, said prosecutor Eneli Lauritsa.

The ‌indictment states that Burtseva was aware that her actions‌ were illegal and continued the activity prohibited by the sanctions even after the Kremlin’s propaganda website “Sputnik Eesti” was closed in ⁢2019 for violations ‌of the sanctions.

In 2020-2023, Burtseva⁤ continued to create content for the propaganda website “Baltnews.ee” using the pseudonym Alan Torms.

The Estonian Prosecutor’s ‍Office,‌ based on the obtained evidence, believes that Burtseva ‌deliberately violated international sanctions.

As KaPo pointed out, Burtseva worked as a propagandist on portals serving the Kremlin’s aggressive interests, and the investigation found that her actions ​were both a violation of international sanctions and treason.

In 2019-2021, Burtseva studied in the Sevastpol State University master’s program on information and hybrid conflicts in occupied Crimea, which was supervised and directed by⁣ a former Russian Federal ​Security Service (FSB) counterintelligence officer ‍and head⁢ of⁤ a private intelligence firm registered in Russia. ‌The aim of the two-year master’s program is to train international media workers‍ and analysts who could “fight against the⁢ hybrid ‌threat to Russia”, the prosecutor said.

After completing ⁢her studies, Burtseva together with the director of the program wrote the book “Hybrid war for the world”, and in it describes a global hybrid ‍war in which Russia should win.​ The book was presented ⁣as written in Estonia, and, according to the prosecutor’s office, it was published as the work of political scientist LBSvet. LBSvets is Burtseva’s pseudonym, the prosecutor’s office found out.

The book belittles and discredits Estonia and its institutions, as well as attempts to ⁤divide Estonian society, the prosecutor said.

The prosecution‌ believes that‌ the evidence collected in the indictment‍ confirms that Burtseva, as an Estonian citizen, has committed treason against⁢ the independence ⁣and sovereignty of Estonia through non-violent actions.

Interview Between the Time.news​ Editor ⁢and Expert on Russian Propaganda, Svetlana Burtseva Case

Editor: Welcome, ⁤and ‌thank you for joining us ⁤today. We have a complex and controversial topic​ to discuss:⁣ the case of Svetlana Burtseva, a naturalized ⁢Estonian‍ citizen accused of continuing⁢ to‌ engage in prohibited activities‌ related to Russian propaganda.‌ To​ help us delve deeper into this, we⁢ have Dr. Alexei Korolev, an expert in media studies and​ propaganda. Thank you‌ for being ‍here, Dr. Korolev.

Dr. Korolev: Thank ⁢you for having ⁢me. It’s an important ⁣topic, especially given the current geopolitical tensions.

Editor: Let’s start with ‍Svetlana ​Burtseva. She obtained Estonian citizenship in 1994 ⁢but has been implicated in spreading Russian propaganda ‍for several years. ⁢What does this duality of identity imply in ⁣the context of modern information warfare?

Dr.⁢ Korolev: It’s a fascinating yet troubling⁤ situation. Burtseva’s case illustrates how individuals⁤ can navigate dual identities to influence narratives from‍ different sides. Her Estonian citizenship gives her a unique platform and‌ access to both Norwegian and Russian⁢ perspectives, which she has exploited to serve the Kremlin’s⁢ agenda despite legal consequences. This highlights a‌ broader trend where citizens may ⁢act against their country’s interests, often driven ‍by⁢ ideological beliefs or financial incentives.

Editor: Indeed, the indictment suggests that Burtseva was​ aware ⁣of the illegality of her ​actions yet continued her work after the closure of the “Sputnik Eesti” site in 2019. ⁢What does this say about the motivations behind such actions?

Dr. Korolev: It⁣ implies a⁤ level⁣ of commitment to the‌ cause, possibly rooted in political ideology or allegiance to Russia. For many involved in the propagation ‌of state narratives, especially in the⁢ context ⁢of propaganda, the lines⁣ between legality, morality, ⁣and loyalty can become blurred. ⁤Burtseva’s continued output under a pseudonym indicates she was active despite recognizing the potential⁤ repercussions.

Editor: She operated‌ under the ​pseudonym “Alan Torms” to create​ content for “Baltnews.ee” between 2020 and 2023. What are the implications of using ‌a ⁤pseudonym in this context?

Dr. Korolev: Using a ⁤pseudonym serves multiple purposes. It can be a way to evade legal scrutiny, but it also allows individuals to separate their personal identities from their⁣ professional actions, particularly when those actions are controversial. Moreover,⁤ it ​speaks to the tactics employed by state-sponsored ⁤media: leveraging anonymity to continue influencing public opinion without ⁤facing​ direct accountability.

Editor: ‌The Estonian Prosecutor’s‌ Office claims to have gathered ⁢significant evidence against ‌Burtseva. How ‍does this reflect on the effectiveness of regulatory measures against ⁤propaganda?

Dr. Korolev: It’s a crucial development. Robust evidence collection is ‍vital for actions against propaganda, especially ⁢when it involves individuals operating under the radar. This case also indicates that Estonia is proactive in ‌countering disinformation, which is necessary in‍ an age characterized by digital ⁤information warfare. However,‌ it also raises‍ broader questions about the‍ balance between freedom⁤ of expression and national ⁣security.

Editor: What can other nations learn from Estonia’s approach to dealing with individuals like Burtseva?

Dr. Korolev: Nations must⁣ continually⁢ assess⁢ and enhance their legal frameworks to ‍handle the evolving landscape of⁣ information warfare. It’s not enough to merely ⁢punish individuals like⁣ Burtseva; countries should also focus on education and ⁣public awareness campaigns about disinformation tactics. Furthermore, international cooperation can aid in emerging⁤ threats⁣ as these issues are rarely confined by⁣ borders.

Editor: Thank‌ you, Dr. Korolev, for sharing your insights​ on this pressing‌ issue. The case of Svetlana Burtseva⁣ serves as a cautionary tale about the complexities ​of identity, legality, and moral responsibility in today’s ⁤interconnected world.

Dr. Korolev: Thank you for having me. It’s essential to keep‍ these discussions ongoing as we navigate the challenges posed by propaganda and disinformation.

Editor: And thank you to our audience for joining ‌us‌ in ‍this⁣ crucial ⁣discussion. Stay tuned for more insights and ⁢analysis from Time.news.

You may also like

Leave a Comment