Lean – conscious
The President of Turkey, Recep Tayyip Erdogan, said that the United Nations is unable to prevent conflicts around the world, especially in Gaza, and find solutions to the current crises.
For more news, subscribe to our channel on Telegram
Erdogan came to Brazil to participate in the G20 summit, where he had his first meeting with Brazilian President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva.
During the meeting, bilateral relations between Turkey and Brazil, and regional and global issues were discussed, and President Erdogan emphasized that the high-level dialogue is important for the development of relations between Turkey and Brazil, and that it will continue they are working to develop the strategy. partnership between the two countries.
President Erdogan said, “The United Nations is not able to prevent conflicts around the world, especially in Gaza, and it is not able to find solutions to crises.”
He added: “It is appropriate for Brazil to put global governance reform on the agenda during the G20 summit.”
President Erdogan emphasized that “Brazil’s position against the Zionist attack is clear, and that Ankara launched an initiative within the United Nations to stop the sale of arms and ammunition to the occupation forces.”
He expressed that “a permanent ceasefire must be achieved in Palestine, and humanitarian aid must be delivered without interruption, and Türkiye will continue to do its best to find a solution.”
The Brazilian city of Rio de Janeiro will host the G20 summit, to be held on November 18 and 19, and will address issues such as fighting poverty, reforming international institutions and the global economy.
What are the main challenges the United Nations faces in effectively addressing global conflicts, according to experts?
Time.news Interview: Erdogan, the UN, and Global Conflicts – A Discussion with Dr. Emily Harrington, International Relations Expert
Time.news Editor: Welcome, Dr. Harrington! Thank you for joining us today to discuss the recent statements made by Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan regarding the role of the United Nations in global conflicts, particularly in Gaza.
Dr. Emily Harrington: Thank you for having me! It’s an important topic and I’m glad we can delve into it.
Editor: Let’s start with Erdogan’s assertion that the United Nations has been ineffective in preventing conflicts. What do you think are the main challenges the UN faces in this regard?
Dr. Harrington: That’s a great question. The challenges are multifaceted. Firstly, the UN operates on consensus among its member states, which can lead to inaction, particularly when powerful nations have conflicting interests. Additionally, issues like underfunding, bureaucratic inefficiencies, and the complexity of modern conflicts, including armed non-state actors, make it difficult for the UN to effectively intervene.
Editor: Erdogan specifically pointed to Gaza. What does the situation there reveal about the limitations of international organizations in conflict resolution?
Dr. Harrington: The Gaza situation exemplifies the struggle of international organizations to mediate effectively. There are significant geopolitical dynamics at play, with several countries and factions involved. The UN has attempted various resolutions and peace talks, but the lack of truly comprehensive and enforceable agreements often means that the underlying issues remain unresolved.
Editor: How do you assess the effectiveness of UN resolutions that aim to address the situation in Gaza? Are they often more symbolic than practical?
Dr. Harrington: Unfortunately, many UN resolutions tend to be more symbolic. While they do represent international consensus, without the will or ability of member states to enforce them, they can fall flat. This situation also highlights issues of accountability; if resolutions are ignored, there’s little recourse for international enforcement.
Editor: In light of Erdogan’s comments, do you think there’s a growing sentiment among leaders like him that the UN may need reform? What changes would be necessary?
Dr. Harrington: Absolutely, many leaders are calling for reform of the UN. Potential changes could include restructuring the Security Council to reflect current geopolitical realities, such as the inclusion of emerging powers and better representation from the Global South. Moreover, strengthening the UN’s peacekeeping mandates and capabilities could enhance its ability to respond to crises effectively.
Editor: And do you think the UN’s credibility can be restored in regions like the Middle East, where trust has eroded?
Dr. Harrington: Regaining credibility will require concerted effort and genuine engagement with all parties involved. This means not only listening to the voices of those in conflict but also ensuring that all stakeholders feel represented in resolutions and peace efforts. Building trust will take time, but it’s essential for sustainable peace.
Editor: what do you consider the most important takeaways from Erdogan’s remarks?
Dr. Harrington: Erdogan’s remarks highlight a critical frustration with the existing international framework for conflict resolution. The UN’s limitations are evident, but reform might help evolve the organization into a more effective player. Ultimately, dialogue, collaboration, and innovative solutions are needed to address these complex global conflicts more effectively.
Editor: Thank you for your insights, Dr. Harrington. It’s clear that the path to peace requires not only intention but also systemic change. We appreciate your time today!
Dr. Harrington: Thank you! It’s been a pleasure discussing these pressing issues with you.