The Wall Street Journal, criticized the oil shipments that were made from Mexico to Cuba, whom he pointed out as the “greatest enemy of democracy.”
The newspaper criticized the government of Claudia Sheinbaum, president of Mexico, for the actions you have taken recently.
His decisions have left in doubt whether he will seek to consolidate Mexico as a “one-party” government and lean to the left..
This after the reform of the Judiciary, the battle against the Supreme Court of Justice of the Nation (SCJN) and the support it has given to Cuba. Below we explain the topic.
The Wall Street Journal warns that Mexico could become a one-party government
The Wall Street Journal noted that the world is waiting to see whether the administration of the president of Mexico, Claudia Sheinbaum Pardo, will seek investments or lean left and consolidate a one-party government.
This by accusing that two of the actions that the Mexican president has had anticipate that the second will happen, and that for this reason “the peso continues to fall against the dollar.”
And this Sunday, November 17, the exchange rate between Mexico and the United States is 20.5849 pesos per dollar.
Regarding actions that threaten Mexico becoming a one-party government, The Wall Street Journal referred to the dispute with the SCJN over the reform of the Judicial Branch, that reached the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACHR), and thesupport that has been provided to Cuba with thousands of barrels of oil.
The Wall Street Journal criticizes the Mexican government for supporting Cuba
The Wall Street Journal criticized the shipment of 400 thousand barrels of oil by Mexico to Cuba, recently sent due to the humanitarian crisis to alleviate the energy problem they are currently experiencing.
The newspaper editorial criticized that the president of Mexico has sent the equivalent of between 26 and 30 million dollars in oil to Cuba, when said amount could be better invested in the needs of the Mexican country.
“Instead, “He is supporting the Cuban communists who want to avoid a public revolt in the midst of a collapse of public services.”noted The Wall Street Journal.
And although the American newspaper mentioned the suffering of the people of Cuba, due to the crisis they are going through due to the reduction in oil imports and the passage of Hurricane Oscar, it noted that Sending money to the island only helps the rulers and not the citizens.
“The agony of the Cuban people is real, but sending money or oil to their rulers will not alleviate their pain. “It will simply keep the regime in power.”
The Wall Street Journal
In that sense, The Wall Street Journal accused that Claudia Sheinbaum’s decision to support Cuba, “the greatest enemy of democracy in the Western Hemisphere,” It is another reason why companies reconsider investments in Mexico.
Interview between Time.News Editor and Political Analyst Dr. Elena Torres
Time.News Editor: Welcome, Dr. Torres. Thank you for joining us today to discuss the recent criticisms leveled at the Mexican government by The Wall Street Journal, particularly regarding its relationship with Cuba.
Dr. Elena Torres: Thank you for having me. It’s a critical time for Mexico, and these issues are very important to unpack.
Editor: Let’s dive right in. The Wall Street Journal referred to Mexico’s oil shipments to Cuba as supporting “the greatest enemy of democracy”. Can you explain the implications of these shipments for Mexico’s international standing?
Dr. Torres: Certainly. By providing significant amounts of oil to Cuba, Mexico is seen as aligning itself with a regime that is often criticized for human rights abuses and authoritarian governance. This not only affects Mexico’s diplomatic relations with countries that oppose Cuba, like the United States, but also raises concerns about Mexico’s commitment to democratic values. It sends a signal that the current administration might be more inclined to consolidate power rather than promote democratic governance.
Editor: Speaking of consolidating power, The Wall Street Journal pointed out potential moves towards a “one-party” system in Mexico under President Claudia Sheinbaum. Do you believe these interpretations are justified?
Dr. Torres: Absolutely. There are valid concerns regarding Sheinbaum’s recent actions—most notably, the proposed reforms to the Judiciary. These reforms could weaken the independence of the judiciary, which is essential for a healthy democracy. When a government disputes the authority of the highest judicial body, as we’ve seen with the Supreme Court of Justice, it raises alarms about potential authoritarian tendencies.
Editor: The exchange rate between the peso and the dollar has also been mentioned, with the peso continuing to fall. How does this economic factor tie into the political landscape?
Dr. Torres: A declining peso can be indicative of a lack of investor confidence, which is often influenced by political instability or unfavorable policy decisions. As investors perceive risk with potential one-party consolidation and aggressive reforms, it makes Mexico less attractive for foreign investment. If these trends continue, we could see broader economic repercussions that might challenge Sheinbaum’s administration in the long run.
Editor: Given the context, what should Mexican citizens be aware of in terms of their government’s direction?
Dr. Torres: Citizens need to remain vigilant and informed. It’s crucial for the electorate to engage in discussions about the judiciary’s independence, media freedom, and international relations. The trajectory of Mexico’s democracy is at stake; any trend towards authoritarianism could undermine the rights and freedoms that have been fought for over decades.
Editor: What potential actions could citizens or civil society take in response to these developments?
Dr. Torres: Advocacy is key. Citizens can mobilize through civil society organizations to demand transparency and accountability from their government. Engaging in peaceful protests, participating in public discussions, and utilizing social media to raise awareness are vital. It’s also important they hold lawmakers accountable through voting and participation in local governance.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Torres, for sharing your insights on these pressing issues. It looks like Mexico is at a critical crossroads, and the coming months will be telling for its democratic future.
Dr. Torres: Thank you for having me. It’s essential we keep the dialogue open and ongoing as events unfold.