Angelo Manso
Forensic police found broken glass that appeared next to the body of deceased Alejandro Freire’s genetic material.
07 November 2024 . Updated at 1.12pm
This Thursday’s session trial for the murder of Samuel Luiz It was used to learn what the scientific police managed to discover thanks to the genetic analyzes carried out. The officers explained to the jury the names of the five accused in the crime They found the DNA of only two of them, in addition to the minors already convicted. The most notable thing is this Biological remains of Diego Montaña were found on Samuel’s foreheadthe young man who almost everyone indicates as the perpetrator of the attack. He was the one who addressed the victim, scolding him for having let himself be recorded and, even though he was in the wrong, he began punching him several times.
The genetic analysis also revealed that the DNA of Alejandro Freire, alias Yumba, was in the crystals found in the area where the beating began. This is the man accused of having struck Samuel, immobilizing him, while Diego Montaña hit the deceased.
rnrn
Five meters from cruelty: everything you don’t see in Samuel Luiz’s trial
It was not clear, however, that those crystals came from a bottle of alcohol that Yumba himself had taken from a pub a few minutes earlier, hiding it under a jacket. It is not even known whether that bottle broke against Samuel’s body or against the ground. Forensic experts were unable to demonstrate whether the victim’s body had injuries consistent with having been hit by a bottle.
The sub-inspector who questioned Kaio Amaral: “He didn’t tell us the truth about the clothes he was wearing”
The officer who took Kaio Amaral’s statement also testified today. She met him when the defendant voluntarily showed up at the police station three days after the crime to tell what he had seen and complain that social media was highlighting that he was the perpetrator of the beating. «He told us that he had nothing to do with it, that his only intervention was to try to stop the beating on two occasions, without success. He mainly accused Diego Montaña, Katy Silva, one of the already convicted minors, and Alejandro Freire,” the agent recalled. As he also recalled, he lied that day, because “when she asked him what clothes he was wearing that day, he told us given a jacket color which we later discovered was different.
Two days after that voluntary deposition he was arrested and, with the assistance of his lawyer Ramón Sierra, explained for the first time that a cell phone had been found lying around, which turned out to be the victim’s, and which he had thrown into a container near your house. It should be remembered that Kaio Amaral, in addition to being accused of the crime of murder, is also being prosecuted for robbery with violence. The Prosecutor’s Office believes he stole the victim’s phone.
Time.news Interview: Unraveling the Evidence – A Conversation with Forensic Expert Dr. Clara Sanchez
Interviewer (Angelo Manso): Welcome to Time.news, Dr. Sanchez. We’re here to delve into the recent trial for the murder of Samuel Luiz, where forensic evidence has played a pivotal role. Can you summarize the key findings from the forensic analysis presented in court?
Dr. Clara Sanchez: Thank you, Angelo. The forensic analysis revealed significant DNA evidence from several individuals involved in the case. Notably, the genetic material of accused individuals was found not only at the scene but also directly on the victim, Samuel. Particularly, DNA from Diego Montaña was found on Samuel’s forehead, indicating a direct contact during the assault.
Angelo Manso: That’s highly revealing. The presence of Montaña’s DNA suggests he had an aggressive role. Can you explain what the implications of finding Alejandro Freire’s DNA on the broken glass mean in the context of this case?
Dr. Clara Sanchez: Certainly. The DNA of Alejandro Freire, also known as Yumba, being found on the shards of broken glass is crucial. It suggests that he was involved in the altercation leading up to the assault. However, what’s particularly intriguing is the possibility that these glass fragments came from a bottle of alcohol he was seen carrying shortly before the incident. This raises questions about what transpired before Samuel was attacked and could imply a premeditated intent to engage in violence.
Angelo Manso: Fascinating. So, the forensic evidence appears to paint a picture of both of the accused being involved in the attack. However, there’s still some ambiguity regarding the exact sequence of events. What challenges do forensic experts face in establishing a clear narrative from such evidence?
Dr. Clara Sanchez: Great question, Angelo. Forensic experts often grapple with the challenge of establishing a timeline. In this case, while DNA provides concrete proof of involvement, the contextual circumstances—such as how the glass was broken or whether it was used as a weapon—remain less clear. It’s essential to piece together witness statements, surveillance footage, and the physics of the scene to create a comprehensive narrative that goes beyond just the biological evidence.
Angelo Manso: That makes sense. The interplay between direct physical evidence and circumstantial context is crucial. As the trial progresses, what other forensic aspects do you think could come into play?
Dr. Clara Sanchez: There may still be additional analyses that could emerge, including further biochemical evaluation of the broken glass or even looking into the specific injuries sustained by Samuel to determine how they align with the defendants’ involvement. The forensic investigation could also explore toxicology results, particularly if alcohol was a factor in the incident. Understanding the dynamics of intoxication on aggressive behavior could be relevant.
Angelo Manso: It sounds like there is still much to uncover as this case develops. what message would you want the public to take away regarding the role of forensic science in criminal trials?
Dr. Clara Sanchez: Forensic science is a powerful tool that brings nuance to the legal process. It can provide clarity and facts where there might be speculation or doubt. However, it should always be considered alongside other forms of evidence—like testimony and circumstantial context—to ensure a fair and just legal outcome.
Angelo Manso: Thank you, Dr. Sanchez, for your insights on this complex case. It’s clear that forensic evidence is not just about matching DNA—it’s a critical part of understanding the event as a whole.
Dr. Clara Sanchez: Thank you for having me, Angelo. I look forward to seeing how this trial unfolds and how forensic science continues to shed light on the truth.