The Attorney General’s Office of Mexico City (FGJCDMX) led to process Miguel “N”., possible feminicide from Iztacalco, for his probable participation in the crime of femicide that occurred in 2015, for which he will face a new criminal process in confinement.
The capital’s Prosecutor’s Office reported that with the evidence gathered it was possible to obtain from a control judge the order linking Miguel “N” to trial. for his possible participation in the deprivation of a woman’s life.
You may be interested in: Decriminalization of abortion diverts attention from priorities for women: collective
“During the continuation of the hearing, the judge ratified the precautionary measure of preventive detention for the now accused and set a period of six months for the closure of the complementary investigation.”The FGJCDMX indicated in a statement.
Investigations carried out by the Prosecutor’s Office for Investigation and Search for Missing Persons (Fipede) the now accused possibly deprived a woman of her life in 2015, as he could have summoned the victim with the intention of taking her to an apartment located in the neighborhood La Cruz, in the Iztacalco mayor’s office.
Authorities located bone remains and belongings of the victim in said property, this derived from a search carried out last April, which was implemented after various investigations initiated by the feminicide of a teenager and the attempted feminicide suffered by her mother. last one inside an adjoining apartment.
Elements of the Investigative Police (PDI) completed the arrest warrant in recent days against Miguel N, who was already in confinement.
Related
Interview Between Time.news Editor and Legal Expert on Femicide in Mexico
Time.news Editor: Good morning and welcome to our special segment on pressing social issues. Today, we have an expert in criminal law and women’s rights, Professor Elena Ruiz, joining us. Thank you for being here, Professor Ruiz.
Professor Elena Ruiz: Good morning! Thank you for having me.
Editor: Let’s dive right into the recent case involving Miguel “N” and the ongoing issue of feminicides in Mexico. There has been a public outcry regarding the handling of such cases. What are your thoughts on the Attorney General’s Office’s decision to bring about this new criminal process?
Professor Ruiz: This move is significant. It indicates that the Attorney General’s Office of Mexico City is taking a more proactive stance in addressing femicide, a crime that has been historically underprosecuted in Mexico. The fact that they are pursuing justice for a case dating back to 2015 reflects a commitment to hold perpetrators accountable, even years after the incident.
Editor: Absolutely. It’s crucial that these cases don’t fade away. Can you elaborate on the broader implications of this case, especially in terms of legal precedents and societal reaction?
Professor Ruiz: Certainly. This case could set a potent legal precedent. It not only underscores that the justice system can operate retroactively to seek justice for individuals affected by femicide, but it may also encourage more victims and their families to come forward. Societally, it could help raise awareness around the issue of violence against women in Mexico, contributing to a necessary cultural shift regarding how such cases are perceived and handled.
Editor: Speaking of cultural shifts, Mexico has seen extensive protests against gender violence. How do you think this case will impact public sentiment and activism surrounding women’s rights?
Professor Ruiz: The ongoing activism has been a crucial catalyst for change. High-profile cases like this one often ignite further protests and encourage discussions among the public. The continued legal action against Miguel “N” can energize movements advocating for stronger legal protections for women and could reinforce the demand for systematic reform in how femicides are investigated and prosecuted.
Editor: That’s an interesting point. As we look at the evidence mentioned by the capital’s Prosecutor’s Office, how important is it for authorities to be transparent with the evidence they gather, especially in femicide cases?
Professor Ruiz: Transparency is vital in restoring trust in the judicial system. When authorities share information about the evidence and processes, it not only educates the public but also holds the justice system accountable. In femicide cases, where victims are often marginalized, transparency can serve as a beacon of hope for justice.
Editor: Very well said. what do you think the next steps should be for authorities, both in Mexico City and nationwide, to effectively combat femicide?
Professor Ruiz: Authorities need to implement comprehensive strategies that go beyond prosecution. This includes preventive measures, community education, and support systems for victims. Training law enforcement and the judiciary on gender sensitivity is essential to ensure that cases are treated with the seriousness they deserve. Moreover, fostering community involvement in addressing the root causes of violence against women is a critical step toward change.
Editor: Thank you, Professor Ruiz, for your insights today. It’s clear that addressing feminicide requires a multifaceted approach that engages not just the legal system, but also society as a whole.
Professor Ruiz: Thank you for having me. It’s been a pleasure to discuss these important issues.
Editor: And thank you to our listeners for tuning in. This is a critical conversation, and we hope it encourages awareness and action in our communities. Until next time!