“They said Jesus Christ sold his twin brother into slavery”

by time news

2024-11-13 03:32:00

Well no, listen: the English Catherine Nixey He does not show off ⁤his ‍horns⁣ or brandish a trident. If he has⁢ them, this journalist and historian specializing in heresies hid ⁣them well before we entered the room. Although she admits that she lacks the fingers to ‌count how many times⁣ she‍ has been accused of harboring ‌a singular hatred towards Christianity. “When a‌ hermit friend ⁤of‍ my father’s ‌heard I was about ‍to publish this book, he insisted ⁢he⁤ had to stop me and get me back on track,” ⁢he jokes. But ​this,⁤ he whispers, was ​an impossible task. Not only because she declares herself⁣ an atheist – which ​she is – but because she defines herself ⁤as “a journalist who limits herself to telling little-known stories” with the‍ aim of “surprising the ​general public”.

Those included in⁤ that new‍ essay, ‌”Heresy” (Taurus), meet both requirements. Why yes, it‍ is​ amazing that‌ he was called a prophet Apolonio de Tiana whose life was similar⁢ to that of Jesus, as well⁣ as some ⁤apocryphal gospels which recall the strange test of virginity to which the Virgin Mary was subjected. “They wrote that a ⁤midwife put a finger ⁣in her vagina‌ and that she pulled out her charred ⁣hand!” His, he says, is‌ a ⁢work that crosses all these heretical passages;⁣ a⁤ way​ to make the general public understand that ​”there were ⁤many Jesus Christ and many primitive Christians”, but ‌that only one was the one who stood above the others after two thousand years ⁤of​ councils and dilemmas.

–You have explained on many occasions that your mother ‌was ​a nun ‍and your father⁢ a monk. How did you meet and how did ‌you decide to have a daughter?

It’s not as rare as it seems!‌ [Ríe] Some people have written to me to tell me they⁣ are in⁢ a similar situation.⁤ My mother had already renounced ⁢the⁤ Church when‍ she met my father; At the time I ​was teaching ⁢in a Catholic school. There she met my‌ father, who ⁣soon after also​ abandoned her.

–Is this book‍ your particular ‘revenge’ ⁣against Christianity?

Obviously ⁤not. [Ríe] ‌I think ​the ‍Catholic Church has done extraordinary things, ⁤but ‌I don’t write ​about it because there are already many books that‌ talk about it. I tell ​the ​unknown story. Furthermore, there was a time when it was difficult to⁣ do things without relying on ‌the Church.

–What ‘surprising‌ things’ could you list?

Many. I love⁤ the art⁢ of churches: the songs, the music, the vespers… Also ‌the idea that we should try to improve our behavior. At its best, Christianity ⁢has caused people to do good ‌things. But I ‍think people who read my book have this in mind. On the other hand, it also has negative⁤ things.

–In his work he states that there were⁣ many prophets in ​the ⁤1st century ⁣AD⁣ and the life of one of ⁤them was very similar to that of Jesus⁣ Christ.

The parallelism⁢ with the Greek Apollonius of Tyana⁤ is surprising. Both were⁢ born at the turn‍ of the ⁤millennium‌ and were probably contemporaries. ​He⁢ said his father ​was a god and his ‌mother a mortal. And ‍also ​that, when she ⁢became pregnant with him, a divine being ⁤appeared to ⁤her and told her that‍ the child⁢ would be a god made of flesh and blood.

–He includes many of these ‘prophets’ in his work. Each one⁣ more bizarre.

There were many characters with these characteristics. Classical⁢ texts ⁤denigrated them and said they were clones: they all had long hair, wore simple ⁢clothes and went ‌barefoot or with⁣ sandals. Some wear ⁢wigs or ​extensions ​to look ​like a divine figure! The 2nd century Greek philosopher Celsus claimed that

–Did they also say this about the ‌first⁤ Christians?

Yes, because they wanted to put an end to Christianity. They said the Gospel was sloppily written. ‍But we⁢ are talking about the ‍religion of some⁣ fishermen, and⁤ so they wrote. They also did ⁣not believe in Mary’s virginity, they were convinced that she had become pregnant by a⁢ Roman legionary.

–The virginity test​ episode is really crazy…

[Ríe] ⁤ It is recorded in‌ some apocryphal ​gospels. A woman arrives​ and, skeptical that Mary is a virgin,⁢ inserts a ‌finger into her vagina. After ‌that, his hand is charred.

– He states that ⁣there are⁤ several apocryphal gospels that⁢ have tiptoed through ⁤history.

It seems that‌ the⁢ four ​gospels were⁣ first, but no. ⁣They ‌were the ones accepted by ⁢the Orthodox Church. The rest ⁣have disappeared, although their translations remain. ‌Many of them are integrated into current beliefs. An example is the Christmas image of the Bethlehem Portal with the‍ ox and ​the mule. This⁢ is not​ found ​in the New Testament. And the​ same thing happens‍ with the story that says that Mary⁤ arrived⁤ in Bethlehem on a donkey.

–Collect one​ of these texts that ⁣states⁣ that Jesus Christ sold his brother ⁤into slavery…

It’s surprising, of ⁢course. It’s⁢ Tommaso’s. Even though he claims ⁢to be her twin‌ brother in ⁣the story, we’ll‍ skip that ⁣part because he may be referring to‌ the fact that they looked alike physically. This text explains that Jesus ordered Thomas to go to⁢ India to preach his ​word, but he refused. Jesus then saw an‌ Indian ⁤

It’s ‌towards the end‌ of the‍ book. It happened in Persia.⁣ Marco ​Polo wrote that he found a ⁢branch of Christianity that worshiped fire.⁤ My conclusion is that we should be ‍talking about early⁣ Christianity, not a specific⁣ one, and that⁤ this ​has evolved. There were‌ the Ophites, who⁣ worshiped‍ the serpent in the Garden of Eden, or parishioners ‍who married but decided‌ to remain celibate and ​adopt children.

It must be ⁤seen as​ something that has evolved, not as ⁣a final message ⁢set in stone. It all started with Constantine, he unified religion. Who knows ​what would have happened if he had fallen under‌ the ‌influence⁣ of ​another group. The‌ world may have been very different. What ⁤would have happened⁣ if Cleopatra had had a nose a few centimeters ⁤longer? Perhaps Caesar and​ Mark Antony would not have fallen in love with her and would have ‍returned to Rome…

[Ríe] ⁢ Maybe, ​maybe. ‍But⁣ I⁤ like heresies. ⁣It will‍ be a question of ‍my nature.

Interview between Time.news​ Editor and Catherine Nixey, Author of “Heresy”

Editor: Welcome,⁤ Catherine!⁤ It’s ‍a pleasure to‍ have you here. Your book “Heresy”⁢ has certainly⁤ stirred up some intriguing conversations. To ⁣start, ​could you tell us‌ what inspired you to dive⁣ into the often-overlooked ⁤stories ⁤of ⁢early Christianity?

Catherine Nixey: Thank‍ you for having me! The inspiration really comes from my desire to uncover the lesser-known narratives that challenge the⁣ mainstream understanding of ​Christianity. There are‌ so many fascinating figures and events that have been ​overshadowed by⁢ what we⁣ accept as established history. I ⁣wanted to bring ‌these hidden stories to‌ light and show ⁢that the history of early‌ Christianity‌ is much more complex than ​we’ve been led to believe.

Editor: You mention in your book that‍ there were “many Jesus⁢ Christ and⁤ many primitive Christians.” What‍ do ‍you⁤ mean by that, ⁣and how‌ does it ‌shape our understanding of Christianity today?

Catherine Nixey: Great‍ question! What I mean is that there were ​numerous prophetic figures⁢ and various⁣ interpretations of Christian‍ teachings in the first century. For​ instance, Apollonius ​of Tyana was a contemporary of​ Jesus,⁢ and his ‍life bore striking similarities to the narratives ​we⁤ associate with ‌Christ. By examining these⁤ parallels, we can see how ​the ‍development​ of early⁤ Christian thought was influenced by multiple leaders and their teachings, leading to the singular figure of Jesus that‍ we recognize today. This opens up a dialogue about the nature of⁤ belief and the evolution⁤ of religious narratives.

Editor: In​ your research, you discuss some very unconventional and bizarre stories, like ‌the⁢ apocryphal accounts of the ‍Virgin Mary. Can you share more about this and‌ its ⁣significance?

Catherine Nixey: Absolutely! One particularly peculiar⁤ story involves a midwife inserting a ⁤finger to test Mary’s virginity and pulling ‍out a charred‍ hand—it’s certainly shocking! This episode,⁢ recorded in apocryphal gospels, illustrates how certain narratives⁢ were challenged and even ⁢mocked during the early days ‍of Christianity. It’s significant because it shows us the extent to which the beliefs surrounding Mary and the‍ conception ‍of Jesus were⁢ contested. There’s⁤ a rich⁣ tapestry‌ of stories that didn’t⁣ make it ‍into⁢ the ​New Testament,‌ and exploring these can deepen our understanding of early Christian beliefs and controversies.

Editor: Your ⁢background is intriguing, especially given your family history with the⁢ Church. Has that shaped your⁢ perspective, and do⁤ you find it impacts the reception of‌ your work?

Catherine Nixey: In‍ many ways, yes. Growing up with a nun for‌ a mother and a monk for a father ⁤certainly gives‌ one a⁣ unique lens through which to view religious narratives! I often joke that this background means ‍I have ⁣an insider knowledge of certain traditions. However, it also means I have been⁤ accused of anti-Christian sentiments, which isn’t the⁢ case. I aim to present a balanced view⁢ and focus on stories that are often omitted from⁣ the traditional narrative.‌ My ‍goal is to highlight⁣ the complexity and richness of history‌ rather than to throw shade‌ on ​Christianity.

Editor: You do have a balanced approach, ​outlining both the ⁣positive aspects of the Church and the ​negative‍ implications of its history. Can you elaborate on⁤ why it’s essential ⁤to recognize both sides?

Catherine Nixey: Recognizing both ‍sides is⁤ crucial for a‍ comprehensive understanding of history. The Catholic Church has indeed​ contributed ​positively, influencing art, music, and inspiring ethical behavior in communities.‌ Yet, its darker chapters, including censorship of dissenting ‌voices⁢ and‍ suppression of alternative beliefs, must also be acknowledged.​ Ignoring these aspects gives an incomplete‍ picture. This duality encourages readers to‌ question, analyze, ‍and engage⁣ more deeply with the subject ⁣matter,​ rather than passively accepting a⁣ singular narrative.

Editor: what do you hope readers take away from‍ “Heresy”?

Catherine Nixey: ⁣I hope readers walk away with a‌ sense of⁣ curiosity about the stories that shape our beliefs. I want them to feel empowered to question established narratives and⁣ to appreciate the diversity of thought that existed within⁤ early Christianity. My ultimate goal is to surprise and engage the general public, ‍encouraging them to explore these hidden histories for themselves.

Editor: Thank you, Catherine. Your insights and⁢ unique ​perspective are invaluable, and we look forward to seeing‌ how “Heresy” inspires further discussion‌ and exploration in this⁤ field.

Catherine Nixey: Thank you⁤ for having‌ me! It’s been a pleasure discussing these ideas with you.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

Statcounter code invalid. Insert a fresh copy.