Interview wiht NBC Emphasis on ‘U.S. priority pledge’
“I will end mandatory electric vehicles on the first day of my inauguration.”
Abolition of birthright citizenship…Block childbirth away from home
Plan to pardon those involved in the ‘parliamentary invasion’ also revealed
Interview with NBC
An interview with US President-elect Donald Trump released by NBC on the 8th. President-elect Trump said, “Starting from my first day in office, I will strengthen our borders and immediately end the electric vehicle mandate.” NBC broadcast YouTube video capture
“We will end the electric vehicle mandate, which harms America and is not helpful to the environment.”
As soon as President-elect Donald Trump takes office on January 20th next year, he has repeatedly announced his intention to abolish the electric vehicle tax credit system of the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA), which is President Joe Biden’s priority project. He also mentioned that he would weaponize tariffs to realize his ‘america First’ pledge and that he imposed a 50% tariff on washing machines made in Korea and China during his first term in office.
Accordingly, the damage to domestic companies that made large-scale investments in the United states, believing in the Biden governance’s policy of encouraging ‘friendshoring (investment in allies)’, is also becoming visible. There are growing concerns that Korea, facing the chaos caused by martial law and a prolonged vacuum in government affairs, will not be able to properly respond to various pressures from the second Trump administration.
● Korean companies are concerned about the end of mandatory electric vehicles
In an interview with NBC on the 8th,President-elect Trump said,“On my first day in office,I will end the electric vehicle mandate through an executive order,” and “I will end the absurd number of environmental regulations.”
President Biden, who emphasizes environmental friendliness, has promised to convert 50% of new car sales in the United states to electric vehicles by 2030 and has been providing subsidies of up to $7,500 (approximately 10.5 million won) when purchasing electric vehicles made in North America. On the othre hand, President-elect Trump, who denies climate change, harshly criticized the IRA as a ‘green fraud’ during the presidential campaign.
Accordingly, on the 9th, Bloomberg news reported that while competition in the electric vehicle industry is intensifying, Korean electric vehicle battery manufacturers are slowing down or temporarily suspending the construction of their U.S. factories currently in progress due to the return to power of President-elect Trump, who is negative toward electric vehicles. The idea is that Korea’s investments totaling $54 billion (approximately 77.16 trillion won) are under threat. Previously, three domestic battery companies, including Samsung SDI, LG Energy Solution, and SK On, announced that they would build at least 15 factories in the United States.
On this day, president-elect Trump commented on his high tariff pledge, saying, “It is
He also complained about major European countries, saying, “They do not import American automobiles and agricultural products, but the United States is in a ‘double whammy’ of defending them.” He also repeatedly threatened to withdraw from the north Atlantic Treaty Association (NATO) if he does not increase his share of defense costs and increase imports of American products as he wants.
● “Those who stormed the National Assembly were pardoned on the first day”
president-elect Trump also announced his intention to pardon some of his extreme supporters who stormed the Washington Capitol on January 6, 2021, protesting his defeat in the 2020 presidential election. He said the supporters who were imprisoned for storming the National Assembly were “trapped in a dirty and disgusting place.” “I’m living in hell,” he sympathized. He then emphasized his will for a pardon, saying, “I will act quickly on my first day in office.”
He also announced his intention to abolish the birthright citizenship system stipulated by the 14th Amendment to the Constitution. This means banning so-called ‘expedition births’ aimed at obtaining U.S. citizenship. However, the controversy over whether the constitution can be changed by executive order is expected to continue.
However, he said there would be no political retaliation against President Biden, Federal Special Prosecutor Jack Smith, who led the criminal prosecution against him, and Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell, who responded lukewarmly to his request for an interest rate cut during his first term in office. He said it would be. He said, “Punishment (against political opponents) will be achieved through the success (of the second Trump administration).”
Hot news now
svg>
0
What are the potential environmental impacts of ending the electric vehicle mandate in the U.S.?
Time.news Editor (TNE): Welcome to Time.news, where today we have the opportunity to delve into some intriguing developments in U.S.politics. We’re joining forces with Dr. Rachel Thompson, an expert in political science and environmental policy. Thank you for being here today, dr. Thompson.
Dr. Rachel Thompson (RT): Thank you for having me! It’s a pleasure to discuss these important changes on the horizon.
TNE: Absolutely. Recently, an interview with President-elect Donald Trump revealed some of his key plans as he prepares to take office again. One standout pledge was to end the electric vehicle (EV) mandate on his first day. What implications do you foresee from this decision, especially in relation to environmental policy?
RT: Ending the electric vehicle mandate could indeed have far-reaching implications. The current administration has invested heavily in EV technology and aims to increase EV sales to 50% by 2030. President Trump’s stance reflects a broader skepticism of climate-focused policies, wich he has labeled as “green fraud.” Abolishing the EV mandate not only disrupts the trajectory toward greener transportation options but may also hinder innovations within the automotive industry,especially those tied to electric vehicle battery production.
TNE: That’s a critical insight. Now, in conjunction with scrapping the EV mandate, Trump also mentioned a desire to reintroduce high tariffs and cut environmental regulations. how do you think this will impact U.S. relations, particularly with South Korea, which has invested significantly in EV battery production?
RT: The concerns are palpable. South Korea has already committed around $54 billion to establish EV battery manufacturing in the U.S., with major companies like Samsung, LG, and SK On planning to set up multiple factories. If Trump’s administration follows through with stringent tariffs and a reversal of pro-EV incentives, it could result in economic instability for these investments. The potential slowdown or halt in ongoing projects might very well strain U.S.-Korea relations, especially given the backdrop of martial law there. Such uncertainty could deter future investments as well.
TNE: It truly seems that the implications aren’t just economic but could also have significant geopolitical ramifications. Moving onto another aspect of the interview, Trump indicated a plan to pardon those involved in the ‘parliamentary invasion.’ What are your thoughts on this, particularly regarding accountability and public sentiment?
RT: The promise of pardoning individuals involved in the January 6 insurrection signals a disconcerting approach to accountability. This could galvanize his base, who view the actions as patriotic, but conversely, it could alienate moderate voters who seek law and order. It raises critical questions about the future of American democracy and the rule of law.Accountability is fundamental in maintaining trust in governance, and bypassing this could incite significant unrest among different factions of the populace.
TNE: Indeed. The political landscape seems increasingly polarized, which leads us to wonder about the implications of Trump’s overall policy direction. If the U.S. pulls back on environmental regulations and adopts an isolationist stance, what does that mean for America’s global leadership?
RT: America’s retreat from leadership in environmental policy, particularly, could embolden other nations to push their agendas without the same level of scrutiny. Climate change is a global challenge requiring cooperative action. If the U.S. withdraws its commitments, it may very well undermine international efforts, from the Paris Agreement to various multinational environmental initiatives. Additionally, this could shift the balance of global power, allowing nations like China to assert themselves as leaders in both economic and environmental domains.
TNE: Those are compelling points. It’s clear that the dynamics are shifting rapidly, and we’ll be watching closely as these policies unfold. Thank you for sharing your insights with us today, Dr. Thompson.
RT: Thank you for having me! It’s been a pleasure discussing these critical issues with you.