Trump re-elected – Prince Harry and Duchess Meghan gone?

by times news cr

After US⁢ election

Trump has Prince Harry in his sights

Updated on ‌November 9, 2024 – 1:30 p.mReading ⁤time: 3 min.

Duchess Meghan and Prince Harry: ​Donald Trump​ is not‍ a fan of the royal couple. (Quelle: Getty Images / Chip Somodevilla ⁣/ ‌Chris Jackson)

Meghan and ‌Trump don’t think much of each other. Media speculate that the Duchess could‍ leave her homeland. But he​ primarily has her husband in his sights.

Prince Harry should know what Donald Trump thinks of⁣ him.‌ “He cheated on the Queen. That’s unforgivable,” the old and⁤ soon-to-be new US President once said⁤ about Queen Elizabeth⁢ II’s grandson. “If I had my way, he would ⁣be on his own.”

Everything suggests that the dislike⁢ is ⁣mutual. Together with⁣ his wife Duchess Meghan, ⁢who ⁣criticized Trump‍ in ​the past as “misogynistic”, Harry campaigned in ⁢the 2020 US election campaign for voters to “reject⁢ hate speech, misinformation and negativity on ⁤the internet”. They‍ didn’t mention a ⁣name, but everyone agreed who ⁢they meant: Trump.

Now⁣ this same Trump will soon be ​returning to the White House. Does the return of​ one‌ lead to the escape of ‌the other?

British media ‍are already speculating that the‍ couple, who ⁣have lived in California for several years, ⁢could turn their backs on ​the‌ US ‌because of the election⁢ results. “Trump’s victory is what Meghan and Harry feared most – and‌ could drive them out of America,” wrote royals expert Tessa Dunlop in the Independent newspaper.

During the election campaign, the Republican was filmed leafing through a photo book⁤ of ‍his state⁤ visit ⁤to Great Britain ⁣in 2019. Showed‍ his admiration for the Queen, ‌who died in 2022 and who, according to‍ a biographer, did not think much ⁤of Trump. Trump praised Charles and his “wonderful” wife, Queen Camilla. However, he would not protect Harry, Trump told⁤ the newspaper ⁢Express US ​months ago.

Specifically,⁢ it concerns the ⁣prince’s residence permit and the question of​ whether the fifth in line to the British throne lied in his ​visa application. In ​his autobiography “Spare” ⁢(in German:‌ “Reserve”), Harry admitted to having consumed ⁢drugs⁤ such as cocaine, marijuana and psychedelic mushrooms.

According‌ to ⁤the ​conservative US think tank The⁤ Heritage Foundation, Harry should not have ⁤entered the USA against‍ this background. A court ordered Harry’s documents to remain private. Now the think ⁤tank has filed a new ‍lawsuit.

However, according ​to reports, the royal son feels comfortable in California and his children are growing up in isolation, ⁤as desired.⁢ But in⁢ the event that they actually (have to) leave their adopted home of Montecito, Harry‌ and Meghan have allegedly ‌taken precautions. ​The couple had bought​ a luxury property on ⁤the Portuguese Atlantic coast, British media‍ reported a ‌few weeks ago.

This means that Meghan and Harry and⁢ their ⁤children Prince Archie and ⁢Princess Lilibet ⁣would have‍ a possible place of residence in Europe again.​ And they would also be closer to⁤ King ‌Charles​ III, who is⁢ being treated for cancer. Many‍ Brits still have hope ⁢that Harry and the royals will reconcile.

Princess Eugenie could⁤ serve⁣ as a link. Harry’s ‌cousin, the ​younger daughter of Prince Andrew and ​Sarah Ferguson, splits her ⁣time between Portugal and⁤ London with husband Jack Brooksbank and sons August and Ernest.

Interview‍ between Time.news Editor ‌and Expert on Royal and Political Dynamics

Time.news‌ Editor: Today, we are joined by⁢ Dr. Amelia Thorne, a renowned expert in political communication and royal​ affairs. Dr. Thorne, thank you for ⁣being here!

Dr. Amelia Thorne: ⁢ Thank you for having me! It’s a pleasure‌ to discuss such an intriguing topic.

Time.news‌ Editor: The ⁣recent US election has stirred⁤ a lot of discussion, ‍particularly​ regarding ⁣public figures like Donald Trump and Prince Harry. How do you assess the relationship between Trump and Prince Harry, especially in​ light of past statements?

Dr. Amelia Thorne: The relationship ⁣has ‍always been⁢ tense, to put it mildly. Trump has openly criticized Harry, calling ‌him a “cheater” in reference ‍to his relationship with Queen Elizabeth. This animosity is ⁢compounded by ​Harry and Meghan’s past remarks regarding ‌Trump, labeling‌ him as “misogynistic”. It seems we’re witnessing a classic clash of two very ‍different‍ worlds.

Time.news Editor: It appears that both ⁢sides harbor a profound dislike⁣ for each​ other. The article suggests Trump’s potential return to the White House might drive Harry and Meghan out of the U.S. altogether. What are your thoughts on this speculation?

Dr. Amelia Thorne: While it’s ⁢certainly speculation,⁢ it reflects a genuine​ concern among the Sussexes. With Trump back in power, they​ might feel uncomfortable, given ‌his past comments and ⁤the current political climate. Living in California was‌ a way for them to escape royal scrutiny, but a⁣ Trump ⁤presidency could‌ shift that dynamic dramatically.

Time.news Editor: The media’s role ⁣in amplifying these narratives can’t be understated. How significant do⁢ you think public perception is⁤ in shaping the ‌decisions of figures like Harry and Meghan?

Dr. Amelia Thorne: Public ⁣perception ⁤is critical. Both Harry and Meghan ‍have positioned themselves ‌as champions of progressive values, and their actions are often guided by how⁢ they believe they will be perceived. If they feel that their safety and ideals are compromised, ⁤especially in a politically charged environment, it’s likely they would consider ‍relocating.

Time.news Editor: The article also touches on concerns surrounding Harry’s visa ⁤application ‍and his ​past admissions regarding drug use. How⁤ do ​legal‍ implications play into⁤ this equation?

Dr. Amelia Thorne: Absolutely, the legal ramifications are significant. If there ⁣is a belief that Harry may have misrepresented himself on his visa ‍application, it could lead to severe consequences,⁣ including deportation. This⁤ concern intensifies under a ⁢Trump administration, which‍ might​ adopt a stricter immigration policy.

Time.news Editor: As‍ Trump praises figures within the royal ​family while dismissing‌ Harry, do you think this ‌could lead to a broader schism between the U.S. political landscape and royal institutions?

Dr. ‍Amelia⁢ Thorne: ‍It’s a possibility. The monarchy has historically been careful about engaging with American ‌politics, but ⁢Trump’s comments could provoke a more pronounced rift. As public interest in royal affairs intertwines with political narratives, this could push royal ⁢figures like ‍Harry and⁢ Meghan into a‍ defensive position.

Time.news Editor: if​ you had to predict,⁣ how do you see⁢ the next few‌ months unfolding for Harry, Meghan, and ‌Trump?

Dr. Amelia Thorne: If I had to speculate, I ⁣believe Harry and Meghan may weigh their options closely and possibly explore living outside the U.S. to maintain their privacy and ideals. Meanwhile, Trump’s ⁣re-emergence​ is likely⁤ to keep the media spotlight firmly on⁤ their situation, creating tension that⁤ will be ‌hard to navigate​ without significant ⁤diplomatic efforts on ‍their part.

Time.news Editor: Thank you, ⁢Dr. Thorne, for your insights. This certainly adds depth to our understanding of the complex‌ dynamics ‌at play. We look forward to seeing how this unfolds!

Dr. Amelia Thorne: Thank you for having ⁢me! It’s⁣ going⁣ to be an interesting ride for sure.

You may also like

Leave a Comment

Statcounter code invalid. Insert a fresh copy.