The global investment landscape is increasingly shaped not just by economic fundamentals, but by unpredictable geopolitical forces, particularly the actions of former U.S. President Donald Trump. Orbis Investments director and portfolio manager Alec Cutler suggests investors consider a world where Trump’s disruptive policies might actually be prescient, a shift in thinking that’s prompting a reevaluation of undervalued companies in essential sectors. This evolving dynamic, where political risk is paramount, is forcing seasoned investors to adapt and reassess traditional strategies.
Cutler, a veteran with 30 years of experience, notes that government intervention—and the potential for sudden, impactful policy changes—wasn’t a primary concern for investors just five years ago. Now, he begins his day scanning social media for Trump’s latest pronouncements, describing the former president as a “governmental random number generator.” The unpredictability is a stark contrast to the more predictable political climates of the past, and it’s forcing a new level of agility onto investment firms.
The Rise of Geopolitical Risk in Investment Strategy
The shift isn’t simply about bracing for negative impacts like tariffs and conflicts, but similarly identifying potential opportunities arising from this new reality. As nations prioritize energy security, industrial strength, and national resilience, companies serving these critical needs are emerging as particularly attractive investment targets. This focus on essential sectors represents a departure from previous investment trends and reflects a growing awareness of the interconnectedness between geopolitics and economic performance.
Cutler’s approach to navigating this complex environment involves a highly selective investment process. He describes a strategy of identifying companies in temporary downturns, potentially overlooked by the market, and waiting for an anticipated upcycle. “We might look at 100 stocks and buy one,” he explained in a July 2025 interview with the Royal Gazette. However, the added layer of government influence now requires assessing how political actions might impact that anticipated recovery.
Trump’s Influence and the “Middle Powers” Response
The unpredictable nature of U.S. Policy under Trump is also spurring action from other nations, a phenomenon noted in a recent report by TimesLIVE. These “middle powers” are increasingly taking steps to assert their own interests and reduce their reliance on the United States, creating new dynamics in the global order. This trend is not lost on investors, who are paying close attention to how these shifts might reshape markets and create new opportunities.
Cutler’s team is currently analyzing companies like Lululemon, which has experienced stock price declines due to tariff uncertainty and softening consumer demand. The team must now factor in potential retaliatory tariffs from countries like Canada, adding another layer of complexity to the investment decision. This illustrates the far-reaching consequences of political actions and the need for investors to consider a wider range of geopolitical factors.
Adapting to a New Era of Investment
The current environment demands a diversified portfolio and a willingness to “roll with the punches,” as Cutler puts it. The traditional investment playbook is no longer sufficient, and investors must be prepared to adapt to rapidly changing circumstances. This requires a deep understanding of geopolitical risks, a flexible investment strategy, and a long-term perspective.
The focus on essential sectors—energy, security, and industrial strength—suggests a broader trend towards prioritizing national interests and self-sufficiency. This shift could have significant implications for global trade, investment flows, and economic growth. Investors who can anticipate and adapt to these changes are likely to be best positioned for success in the years ahead.
The idea that Trump’s policies, once seen as disruptive, might actually be anticipating a fundamental shift in the global order is a provocative one. Cutler’s perspective highlights the need for investors to challenge conventional wisdom and consider a wider range of possibilities. The era of predictable markets and stable geopolitical conditions appears to be over, and a new era of uncertainty and volatility has begun.
Looking ahead, investors will be closely watching for further developments in U.S. Policy, as well as the responses from other nations. The next key checkpoint will be the unfolding of international trade negotiations and the implementation of new industrial policies. Staying informed and adaptable will be crucial for navigating this complex and evolving landscape.
What are your thoughts on the increasing influence of geopolitics on investment decisions? Share your insights and join the conversation below.
