Voices are joining in Canada calling for Mexico to leave the treaty

by times news cr

New voices of⁤ Canada have come together to position themselves in favor of leave out the Mexicans ⁤ of ‌the Trade agreement between Mexico, the ‍United States and⁣ Canada (T-MEC).

The controversial initiative ⁣was presented for the first time on November 12 by Doug​ Fordthe premier of Ontario, arguing‌ that Mexico is ⁣“the back door of Chinese products.”

Doug Ford‘s statements⁤ were supported by the prime minister of Alberta, a province of Canada,⁣ who also He ‍criticized the ⁤investments that China has made in ‌Mexican territory.

Minister Danielle Smith ⁣supports initiative to leave Mexico‍ out of the T-MEC

The presenter David Cochrane questioned the premier⁣ of Alberta, Danielle Smith, on the decision‌ to‍ exclude Mexico from the T-MEC in the event that said country ‍does⁢ not tighten restrictions on Chinese products.

“One thousand percent. “I am very in tune ​with what you have to say,” Minister Danielle Smith responded without hesitation, according to information shared by ‌the CBC network.

The premier of ‍Alberta argued that⁤ the problem lies in the fact that Mexico has not been an equal partner with​ the United States and Canada.

“Besides that, “They are⁢ inviting ‍China to invest in ‍Mexico”criticized Danielle Smith, who also⁢ pointed out the need to negotiate a bilateral agreement with the United States.

Mexico, United States ⁢and Canada Treaty, T-MEC (EFE)

What did Ontario Premier Doug Ford say?

The Premier of Ontario, Doug⁤ Fordaccused Mexico on November‍ 12 of being ⁢ “the back door” of Chinese productsfor which he presented​ an initiative to ⁣expel that​ country from⁤ the T-MEC.

In front⁣ of the media, Ford said ​that⁣ if Mexico “does⁤ not match‌ the tariffs ​of Canada and the United States” on Chinese imports, then ​it should not “sit at‍ the table (T-MEC) to enjoy access to the largest economy in the world.” .

“If Mexico wants a bilateral trade agreement with Canada, God bless them. But I’m not‌ going to let myself go down with these cheap⁤ imports that take away​ the jobs of the men and women of Ontario.”

Along the same lines,⁢ he pointed out that it is necessary prioritize bilateral partnership between the United States and Canada, to “put ‍American and Canadian workers first.”

How⁢ could Canada and‍ the U.S. address concerns about Mexico’s trade practices without resorting to exclusion from T-MEC?

Interview Transcript:‍ Time.news Exclusive Conversation with Trade Expert Dr. Emily Chen

Time.news Editor (TNE): Welcome, Dr. Chen. Thank you for joining us⁢ today to discuss the recent developments regarding the T-MEC agreement and the controversial call from⁢ Canadian leaders to exclude Mexico from it.

Dr. ⁣Emily Chen (EC): ‌Thank you for having me! It’s ​a pleasure to discuss such an important ⁣issue.

TNE: ⁣ Let’s dive right in. Ontario⁤ Premier⁢ Doug Ford recently suggested that Mexico⁤ acts‍ as “the back door⁤ of Chinese ⁣products” into Canada and the United States. What do you make of this assertion?

EC: ⁤ It’s a provocative statement, to say the least. While there have been concerns regarding China’s ‌influence ‍in Mexico,‍ simply labeling Mexico as a “back door” oversimplifies a complex trading relationship. Mexico is a key trade partner for both Canada and the U.S., and it plays a significant role in the supply chains that benefit all three countries.

TNE: Premier Ford’s perspective is⁢ echoed by Alberta Premier Danielle Smith, who⁣ argues that Mexico has not been an equal partner.⁢ How valid is that viewpoint in your opinion?

EC: It’s true that there are disparities in how Canada and the U.S. view their relationships with Mexico. Smith’s comments about China’s investments ⁤in Mexico raise ⁢critical ‌questions about governance and regulatory standards in trade. ⁣However, it’s⁢ crucial to approach‍ the topic with a nuanced understanding. Mexico has undertaken various reforms to strengthen its trade relations and attract investments beyond just China.

TNE: Danielle Smith also mentioned negotiating a bilateral agreement with the U.S. ⁢What do you think this would ‍look like, and is​ it a feasible path forward?

EC: A bilateral agreement⁣ could‌ provide a ​framework to address specific concerns about regulations and market access that Canada feels are unaddressed ‌within the T-MEC framework.​ However, such agreements can also complicate relations and lead to fragmented trade policies. It ⁣might ⁢be ⁤more ​productive for Canada and the U.S. to collaborate with Mexico on setting common regulatory standards rather than isolating it ‍from ⁢trade discussions.

TNE: The calls to exclude Mexico are ​alarming for some. How do you foresee this impacting ⁣North American trade as a whole?

EC: Excluding Mexico would be disruptive not only to trade but also to the​ economic fabric of ⁢North⁣ America. Mexico ​is integral to manufacturing and supply chains; many ⁤Canadian​ and U.S. companies rely on these connections. If such exclusion were enacted, it could lead to increased costs, supply chain disruptions, and ⁢potentially a⁤ rise in prices for consumers.

TNE: Some analysts have labeled ⁣this initiative as protectionist. Do​ you agree with that characterization?

EC: Yes, I believe it falls under the protectionist umbrella. Protectionist policies often stem from a desire‍ to shield⁢ domestic industries but can backfire in a ‍highly‌ interconnected ⁢global economy. ⁢Instead of excluding Mexico, fostering more ⁢collaboration would likely yield better ‍economic outcomes.

TNE: ⁤ Lastly, Dr. Chen, if Canada and the U.S. move forward⁤ with this⁤ exclusion, what ⁣alternatives‌ exist ⁣for Mexico in the North American trade ⁢landscape?

EC: If Mexico were excluded from T-MEC, it might seek to strengthen its trade relationships with other ⁣countries, such as​ forming closer ‌ties with Europe and exploring agreements⁢ in ⁢Asia. However, that would not replace the substantial economic ties ⁣it has with its⁢ North American partners. Ultimately,​ it would be in the best interest​ of‌ all parties to work⁢ together rather than create new trade ⁢rifts.

TNE: Thank you, Dr. Chen, for ⁤your insights. This topic ​will certainly continue to⁢ evolve,‌ and it’s crucial ‌for leaders to consider all‌ ramifications of their⁤ decisions in trade policy.

EC: Thank you for having me. I look forward to seeing how this unfolds in the ‌coming months!

You may also like

Leave a Comment