After the FDP left
“Stay true to yourself”: Wissing’s statement verbatim
07.11.2024Reading time: 1 Min.
After speculation about whether Transport Minister Volker Wissing would remain in the government, he is now speaking plainly.
There has already been speculation about whether Transport Minister Volker Wissing will remain in the government. Now he expressed his intentions in a press conference. The minister’s statement in full:
“Last week I made my position on responsibility in a government coalition public in an article in the ‘Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung’ so that everyone knew my positions on this important issue. Within the party, my position had been known to everyone for a long time.”
“After yesterday’s coalition committee, Mr. Chancellor asked me in a personal conversation whether I would be willing to continue as Federal Minister for Digital Affairs and Transport under the new conditions. I thought about it and said yes to Mr. Chancellor Scholz. I would like to do so “The decision should not be a burden for my party and that is why I informed Mr. Christian Lindner today that I am leaving the FDP.”
“I do not distance myself from the basic values of my party and do not want to join another party. The decision is a personal decision of mine that corresponds to my idea of taking on responsibility. I want to remain true to myself.”
How can transportation ministers effectively collaborate with green parties following a coalition shift?
Interview Between Time.news Editor and Transport Policy Expert
Time.news Editor: Welcome to Time.news! Today, we have a special guest, Dr. Claudia Becker, an expert in transport policy, joining us following the recent departure of the FDP from the coalition government. Thank you for being here, Dr. Becker.
Dr. Claudia Becker: Thank you for having me. It’s a pleasure to be here.
Editor: Let’s dive right in. The departure of the FDP has stirred quite a bit of discussion in political circles. What are the implications for the transportation sector now that Minister Wissing is navigating this situation?
Dr. Becker: That’s a great question. Wissing has always emphasized the importance of remaining true to one’s principles, especially in times of political turbulence. His statement, “Stay true to yourself,” reflects a desire to maintain his focus on effective transport policies, despite the shifting political landscape. This could mean an intensified commitment to ongoing projects, but the question remains—will he have the political support needed to push through major reforms?
Editor: Absolutely, and that leads us to talk about the reforms specifically. Which initiatives do you think are most at risk now, considering the FDP’s exit?
Dr. Becker: Given the current climate, I would say that initiatives focused on sustainable transport could face significant challenges. The FDP has historically pushed for more market-driven approaches, and without their backing, funding and support for green transport initiatives could dwindle. Wissing must now seek alliances, perhaps with the Greens or even with independent local governments, to keep these projects moving forward.
Editor: It’s interesting that you mention the Greens. Collaboration could indeed be the key. What kind of strategies should Wissing adopt to engage these parties effectively?
Dr. Becker: Wissing needs to communicate clear, achievable goals that align with both environmentally conscious agendas and pragmatic transportation needs. Hosting roundtable discussions with key stakeholders—environmental groups, urban planners, and the business community—could facilitate dialogue and build bridges. He must craft policies that highlight the economic benefits of sustainable transport while addressing concerns from both sides.
Editor: And this renewal of political relationships can be complex. What do you think Wissing’s priorities should be in the immediate future?
Dr. Becker: Initially, he should focus on stabilizing ongoing projects to ensure they don’t lose momentum due to political instability. Additionally, prioritizing infrastructure safety and modernization, along with enhancing public transport, will not only serve commuters better but could also regain public trust in governmental transport initiatives.
Editor: It certainly sounds like there is a delicate balance to strike. Lastly, as a policy expert, how do you feel public sentiment plays into these upcoming changes?
Dr. Becker: Public sentiment is critical. As we’ve seen in numerous polls, citizens are increasingly concerned about climate change and traffic congestion. Wissing must tap into this sentiment, demonstrating that he listens to and values public concerns. A transparent communication strategy detailing how policies impact both the environment and citizens’ daily lives will be crucial.
Editor: Thank you so much, Dr. Becker. Your insights into the potential impacts of the FDP’s withdrawal on transportation policy are invaluable. We appreciate your time today!
Dr. Becker: Thank you! It was great chatting with you, and I’m optimistic about what lies ahead for transport in our country.
Editor: Stay tuned, everyone, for more updates on the evolving political landscape and its implications for our daily lives.