Vox rebounds thanks to the collapse of the PP after the recovery of DANA and PSOE, according to several polls

by time news

⁣ More than a month after the catastrophic DANA ‌which caused more than 200 deaths in the Valencian Community, the latest ​polls point to a general decline of the ⁣PP at the state level, instantly after the​ fall of⁤ the management of President ‍Carlos Mazón’s party ⁢in that community. questioned by neighbors adn authorities. Polls, though, indicate that the‌ main beneficiary of this collapse is Vox, which is growing significantly⁣ both in the ⁣autonomous community and ⁢in the country as a whole.

Puigdemont asks Sánchez to submit to ‍a confidence question in Congress: “He is not worthy of trust”

‌ This Monday the Prisa group, El Mundo and Prensa Ibérica published polls. In the ⁤state ‌investigation conducted by 40dB for El‍ país and cadena Ser, the‍ PP continues ⁢to be the driving force‍ with ​33.3% of the votes, but Alberto Núñez feijóo’s ⁢party records a notable decline compared to‍ the previous month’s poll, losing‌ two points. The PSOE follows as second force with a small increase ‍compared to the November poll, obtaining 29.9% of the‍ votes. ⁣

​ ‌The main rebound and the party that​ benefits⁣ most from the fall of the PP is Vox, which according to‍ 40dB already reaches 13.1%⁤ of the​ votes, ⁣almost‌ two points more than in November. However, Sumar⁣ continues to​ decline,‌ reaching 3.1% of the⁣ votes. Podemos also fell to 2.8% of the votes and Se⁣ Acabó la⁤ Fiesta (SALF), the party of the ultra-agitator⁢ Alvise Pérez, surpasses Ione belarra’s party by ⁢three tenths, reaching 3.1%⁤ of the votes.

⁤ The survey prepared by ⁤the Cabinet of‍ Social​ Studies and Public Opinion (GESOP) for the ⁢group also gives the PP‌ the ⁢winner. Iberian print. Alberto Núñez Feijóo’s party would obtain ⁤31.1% of the votes and 135-139 ⁢seats (today it has 137), or 2.2 points and ​between 6 and 7 seats less than three months ago. In this case Vox also rebounds,maintaining third ​position with ⁢14.7% of ​the vote and between 45-49 seats (today it has 33).⁢

‍ The PSOE would remain at 28.3%⁤ of the votes and 117-121 deputies (it now has 121), 1.3 points and between⁤ 11 and 12 deputies more than ⁣in September. Despite the ⁢recovery of the​ PSOE, the entire left would lose ground, above all due to​ the division between ‌Sumar and podemos, ‍which separately would obtain practically half the ​seats (from 15 ‌to 19) ‍that they obtained together at the polls (31), despite having collected almost the same percentage‍ of votes. Yolanda Díaz’s coalition collapses to its worst record ‌since the elections: 8% of the votes and 13-15 seats, 2.9 points and between 13 and‌ 15 seats less than in‍ September. We could eliminate four tenths of Sumar’s fall and we would⁤ obtain​ 3.5% of the votes and 2-4 deputies.

Mazón’s PP goes from approaching an absolute majority in the ‌polls to sinking and being⁢ dependent on Vox after DANA

‍ In ‍this case, Sumar grows, rising to nine⁤ seats,⁣ three more than a month ago, ⁣but still‌ vrey far from last ‌year’s results. And Podemos maintains its result at 5%,but loses a deputy: from five its ‌estimate ‍would now rise ​to⁢ four.
‌‍

What⁢ are the main political⁤ challenges faced by the PP in the Valencian Community ⁤after DANA?⁣

Time.news Interview: Analyzing the Political Shifts in the Valencian Community post-DANA

Editor: ⁤ Welcome to Time.news. Today, we’re joined ⁢by​ Dr. Maria López, a political analyst specializing in Spanish regional politics. Thank you for being here, Dr. López.

Dr. López: Thank you for having me. It’s ​a critical time for ‌political dynamics in the Valencian Community,‍ and I’m eager to discuss it.

Editor: Certainly.We’ve seen significant political shifts⁣ following the tragic events caused by the DANA. What are your thoughts ⁢on​ the impact of this disaster on​ the political landscape, particularly for the PP?

Dr.López: The DANA was a ‍devastating event, and ⁢its repercussions are being ⁣felt profoundly. The PP, under President ⁣Carlos Mazón, has faced intense scrutiny from ⁢both ‌residents and local authorities regarding their disaster ⁢management. The poll results ​indicate ⁢a clear decline in their support,which can ofen happen when voters​ associate​ a party with ineffective⁢ crisis response.

Editor: That’s‌ fascinating.You mentioned the rise of​ Vox as a beneficiary of this political⁣ landscape shift. What factors do you ⁢believe are ⁤contributing to vox’s growth‌ in the Valencian Community and Spain overall?

Dr. López: Vox ⁣has traditionally positioned itself ​as a party that prioritizes ⁢strong leadership and decisive​ action during crises.​ The PP’s faltering‍ response⁢ has likely opened a door for Vox to capture disillusioned voters. Additionally, they are capitalizing‌ on public sentiment around issues⁤ of governance and disaster preparedness, which⁣ resonate ⁣strongly in the wake of such calamities.

Editor: It sounds ⁣like Vox is presenting itself as ⁣a viable ‌alternative. How do you think this‌ ongoing shift might impact future elections in the region?

Dr.López: Should the current⁤ trend continue, we could see a significant reevaluation ⁣of party dynamics in ⁤the⁤ Valencian Community. ⁤Vox’s ⁢rise‌ might compel ​the PP to ⁢reconsider⁤ its ⁣strategies and⁢ messaging, especially in regions where they have historically been dominant. It may also lead to new coalitions or shifts in alliances,as parties scramble ‍to either regain⁢ lost support or ​fortify alliances with emerging forces.

Editor: That brings up an ‍critically important⁣ point about coalition-building.⁤ With public trust fractured,‍ could we ⁣expect⁤ a shift in how political parties⁢ collaborate or confront each ‌other heading into future elections?

Dr. López: ‍ Absolutely.As⁣ parties reassess their platforms and strategies, we might witness new​ collaborations forming, especially if one party ⁣strengthens while another weakens. ‌The‌ overarching theme will likely be about restoring public trust and demonstrating accountability. In⁢ crisis situations like this,voters pay close attention to how parties respond,which could substantially influence electoral outcomes.

Editor: It sounds ‍like we’re in for⁢ an interesting election‌ cycle. Before we conclude, do you think there’s a message‍ or lesson that the established parties should take from this experience?

Dr. ⁣López: Yes, the key takeaway should be the importance ‌of responsiveness and openness. ‍Voters are increasingly ⁤looking for parties that not⁣ onyl⁣ communicate effectively but also act decisively in times ⁢of ⁣need. ⁣If established parties can learn to engage with their constituents more openly and prioritize community needs, they may find a stronger footing despite recent challenges.

editor: Thank you, Dr. ⁢López.Your insights are invaluable as​ we navigate this complex political ‌landscape. We appreciate your​ time and look forward ⁤to ‍your future analyses.

Dr. López: ⁢ Thank you for having me. It’s been a pleasure,and I’m eager to see how this situation unfolds.

You may also like

Leave a Comment