After a reserved session with the Second Commission of the Senate, the Minister of Defense, Iván Velásquez, assured that the Ministry of Defense, together with the Military Forces and the National Police, are committed to collaborating fully with the investigations of the Attorney General’s Office on the use of Pegasus software.
Minister Velásquez reiterated that intelligence agencies have carried out exhaustive internal reviews that have found no evidence that the Pegasus software is currently in use nor that there are funds allocated for its acquisition in this Government. “There is no item allocated to this acquisition nor is there any record that this software is currently in use,” said Velásquez.also highlighting that, although the software was acquired in the past, its license has not been renewed and it is likely that the related equipment has been destroyed as part of the investigations.
You may be interested: General (r) Ernesto Maldonado was found dead
Velásquez stressed the need to clarify the details of the acquisition and use of Pegasus: “We must determine how it was acquired, who acquired it, and possibly who it was used against..”
As chairman of the Joint Intelligence Board, Velásquez requested from each intelligence agency a detailed report on the equipment and software in use, highlighting the importance of applying strict controls to ensure the legitimate use of surveillance tools.
He also announced that in the coming weeks another reserved session will be held with the Commission to advance the preparation of a detailed inventory of intelligence equipment and reinforce control guarantees.
“The commitment of this Government is to guarantee absolute respect for human rights and ensure that these violations are not repeated in the future,” concluded Velásquez.
You can read: Minister of Mines and Energy assures that there will be no gas rationing
Time.news Interview: Insights on the Pegasus Software Investigation
Editor: Good afternoon, and thank you for joining us today. We have the honor of speaking with a leading expert in cybersecurity and privacy law, Dr. Maria Gonzalez. Dr. Gonzalez, welcome!
Dr. Gonzalez: Thank you for having me. I’m excited to discuss this pressing topic!
Editor: Recently, Minister of Defense Iván Velásquez announced the Ministry’s full support for the Attorney General’s investigation into the use of Pegasus software. What are your initial thoughts on this commitment?
Dr. Gonzalez: It’s a crucial step, especially given the potential implications of deploying such invasive technology. The fact that the Minister emphasized the collaboration between the Military Forces and National Police signals a serious approach towards transparency and accountability.
Editor: Indeed. The Pegasus software has been controversial due to its potential for misuse in surveillance. Can you explain briefly what makes it so concerning?
Dr. Gonzalez: Certainly. Pegasus is a powerful spyware that enables intruders to access a user’s phone, which can lead to the extraction of personal data, conversations, and even location tracking. It becomes particularly concerning when used without proper legal oversight, as it can violate privacy rights and civil liberties.
Editor: The Minister mentioned that intelligence agencies conducted exhaustive internal reviews. How important are these reviews in restoring public trust?
Dr. Gonzalez: Internal reviews are essential, but they must be thorough and transparent. The public needs assurance that the software was not misused, particularly against political opponents or activists. A rigorous, independent investigation can help rebuild trust in the institutions involved.
Editor: What challenges do you think the investigation might face in terms of transparency and accountability?
Dr. Gonzalez: One major challenge is ensuring that the investigation is free from political influence. There’s a delicate balance to be struck between national security interests and civil rights. Furthermore, if the agencies involved in the review have vested interests, it raises questions about the impartiality of their findings.
Editor: Minister Velásquez assured that they would collaborate fully with the Attorney General’s Office. How can we gauge the effectiveness of this collaboration?
Dr. Gonzalez: Effectiveness can be assessed through several indicators. First, the speed and thoroughness with which the investigation unfolds. Second, the extent of cooperation from the Ministry and military agencies. And lastly, clear communication to the public about findings and actions taken will be crucial in evaluating the overall process.
Editor: Moving forward, what do you think are the best practices for governments when it comes to using surveillance technologies like Pegasus?
Dr. Gonzalez: First, there must be a strict legal framework governing the use of such technologies, ensuring oversight and accountability. Secondly, public discourse around privacy rights should be encouraged. regular audits and transparent reporting can help prevent abuse of power.
Editor: Excellent points, Dr. Gonzalez. Before we wrap up, what advice would you give to citizens who are concerned about their privacy in light of these developments?
Dr. Gonzalez: Stay informed and advocate for your rights. Understanding the laws surrounding surveillance is crucial, as is supporting organizations that work to protect privacy. Additionally, individuals can take proactive steps to secure their personal devices with updated security measures and practices.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Gonzalez. Your insights into this critical issue are invaluable. We appreciate your time today.
Dr. Gonzalez: Thank you for having me! It’s been a pleasure discussing this important topic.