Baghdad – IA
The Secretary General of Hezbollah, Sheikh Naim Qassem, declared today, Wednesday, that Hezbollah is not fighting for anyone and that its project is to protect Lebanon, saying that the resistance will disrupt the project Zionist in the region.
For more news, subscribe to our channel on Telegram
Qassem said in his speech – followed by the (INA): “My agenda is to continue the program of the martyr Sayyed Hassan Nasrallah,” giving his “thanks to the leadership of Hezbollah for choosing him to take the heavy this. burden.”
He added, “We adhere to the approach of the martyr Hassan Nasrallah and the people of Gaza have the right that we support them, and we will stay on the path of war within the planned developments,” stressing that there was “resistance to liberate the community. land and address the occupation and its expansive intent.”
He continued, “The Zionist entity committed 39,000 air and sea violations against Lebanon and was not committed to Resolution 1701,” explaining, “By taking a stand, we disrupt the Zionist project.”
He continued in his speech, “There is a big project before us in the region, and it is a war that is not limited to Lebanon and Gaza, but instead it is a global war against the resistance, and its persistence in Gaza and Lebanon will be the future to shape our generations,” he says, “We have said time and time again that we do not want war, but we are ready if it is forced upon us, and we are not fighting for our project or to liberate our land and our country make independent.”
Hezbollah Secretary General declared that “Iran supports us for our project and we do not need anything,” asserting, “We welcome any country that supports the resistance,” asserting that “Hezbollah’s capabilities are great and wide .”
Time.news Editor: Welcome to Time.news, where we delve deep into pressing global issues. Today, we have the pleasure of speaking with Dr. Amina Farah, a prominent Middle East expert and geopolitical analyst. Dr. Farah, thank you for joining us.
Dr. Amina Farah: Thank you for having me. It’s a pleasure to be here.
Editor: Let’s jump right in. Recently, Hezbollah’s Secretary General, Sheikh Naim Qassem, made statements asserting that Hezbollah is not fighting for anyone but rather to protect Lebanon. How should we interpret this declaration in the current context of Middle Eastern politics?
Dr. Farah: Sheikh Naim Qassem’s statement reflects a broader narrative that Hezbollah has cultivated over the years: they position themselves as defenders of Lebanese sovereignty against external threats, particularly Israel. This framing serves to strengthen their legitimacy internally while reinforcing their image within the region. However, it also complicates the dynamics, as Hezbollah’s military actions often align with Iranian interests, which can blur the lines between self-defense and serving a broader agenda.
Editor: That’s an interesting point. He emphasized disrupting the “Zionist project” in the region. What do you think he meant by that, and how does this rhetoric resonate with Hezbollah’s supporters?
Dr. Farah: The “Zionist project” is a term used by various groups to describe what they see as the establishment and expansion of Israel at the expense of Palestinian and Arab rights. For Hezbollah, actively opposing this project functions as a rallying cry. It taps into a deep-seated historical grievance experienced by many Lebanese and Arabs. By positioning themselves at the forefront of this struggle, Hezbollah not only galvanizes its base but also seeks to legitimize its military operations against Israel, emphasizing that they are part of a larger resistance movement rather than mere acts of aggression.
Editor: Given the complex relationships and rivalries in the region, how do you see Hezbollah’s stance affecting Lebanon’s internal politics and its relationship with neighboring countries?
Dr. Farah: Hezbollah’s position has certainly polarized Lebanese politics. While it has a significant support base, their military capability and alignment with Iran often create tensions with rival political factions and exacerbate sectarian divides. Regionally, Hezbollah’s actions can strain Lebanon’s relationships with countries like Saudi Arabia and the Gulf states, who view Iran, and by extension Hezbollah, as a threat. Consequently, Lebanon’s path remains precarious, oscillating between internal power struggles and external pressures.
Editor: It sounds like a precarious balancing act. With the current geopolitical climate evolving daily, what potential shifts should we be on the lookout for regarding Hezbollah and its position in Lebanon and the broader region?
Dr. Farah: One key factor to watch is the ongoing relationship between Iran and the U.S. Any shifts in this dynamic—whether through negotiations or increased tensions—could directly impact Hezbollah’s military strategy and political maneuvering. Additionally, if economic conditions in Lebanon continue to worsen, internal dissent could rise, which might force Hezbollah to change its approach to governance and its military engagements. The responses of regional powers, especially Israel and the U.S., to Hezbollah’s assertions of sovereignty will also be crucial. We may see either a more aggressive posture from these actors or a push for diplomatic resolutions, depending on the circumstances.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Farah, for providing such insightful analysis on a complex issue. It’s clear that the future trajectory of Hezbollah and Lebanon is intertwined with larger regional dynamics, and we appreciate your expertise on the matter.
Dr. Farah: Thank you for the opportunity to discuss these critical issues. It’s important to keep these conversations going as events unfold.
Editor: Absolutely. And to our readers, stay tuned for more updates and expert insights as we continue to monitor this ever-evolving situation in the Middle East. Thank you for joining us at Time.news.