The president advisor of the National Electoral Institute (INE), Guadalupe Taddei assured that the conflict within this autonomous body, in which six councilors proposed the presentation of a constitutional controversy to limit some of its powers, will be resolved between them.
Yesterday, the general council of this autonomous body approved the proposal presented by six councilors for the technical secretary to present a constitutional controversy against the power of the presidency of the INE for the direct appointment of heads of units and technical bodies.
You might be interested in: Xóchitl Gálvez recognizes the dignity of judges who declined to participate in the election
Also yesterday, the deputy Sergio Gutiérrez Luna (Morena), who is the president of the board of directors of San Lázaro and representative of Morena before him INE, presented an initiative so that the power that the councilors disputed would be established in the Constitution, which would be “shielded” from any attempt to limit or eliminate it.
This Thursday, Taddei went to the installation of the Political Electoral Reform Commission of the Chamber of Deputies and ruled out that this initiative to reform Article 41 of the Constitution presented by Gutiérrez Luna will solve the problem within the INE.
“There is no conflict that cannot be resolved within a collegiate body like the INE,” responded the president advisor of the Institute.
Before, he commented that “members in democracy, as in the daily lives of all people, there are moments when we have total disagreements, we struggle a little more to reach agreements, but they are reached.”
He insisted on his position expressed yesterday in the general council session in which he considered that the INE does not even have the power to present institutional controversy, but in the end it was an agreement that was made.
In his participation during the installation of the commission legislative He commented that some of the obligatory issues that deputies will have to address is whether the campaigns will continue to be the same, with the understanding that the General Law of Institutions and Electoral Procedures have not been revised since 2014.
“We will find many areas of opportunity that not only we see, but that you experienced in your own campaigns, you found circumstances that we did not know where a fact was updated or not in each of the processes that you experienced to be present today.
“And we from the procedural democracy side have some things to contribute. Will the inter-campaigns continue to exist? These internal processes that were experienced within the parties, not regulated, will they be regulated today? Will we be seeing a new political communication pact that emerges from this commission?” Taddei mentioned.
You might be interested in: 17 state congresses approve reform to make modifications to the Constitution unchallengeable
ART
Related
Time.news Editor: Good afternoon, everyone. Today, we have a special guest joining us to unpack the ongoing developments at the National Electoral Institute, or INE, in Mexico. We’re fortunate to have with us Dr. Mariana Ruiz, a political analyst and expert in electoral systems. Dr. Ruiz, thank you for being here.
Dr. Mariana Ruiz: Thank you for the invitation! I’m looking forward to discussing this critical issue.
Time.news Editor: Let’s dive right in. Recently, we heard from Guadalupe Taddei, the president advisor of the INE, who addressed the internal conflict within the institute. Six councilors are proposing a constitutional controversy regarding the powers of the presidency at the INE. What are your thoughts on this conflict?
Dr. Mariana Ruiz: The situation is quite complex. The proposal for a constitutional controversy highlights the tension between the councilors and the presidency’s influence over the INE. Taddei’s assertion that the conflict can be resolved internally is optimistic but may overlook the deeper issues at play, particularly regarding autonomy and governance.
Time.news Editor: It’s interesting you mention autonomy. Taddei also responded to a recent initiative by Deputy Sergio Gutiérrez Luna, which aims to formalize the authority of councilors in the Constitution. How significant is this proposal in the context of INE’s independence?
Dr. Mariana Ruiz: Gutiérrez Luna’s initiative could be a significant step towards safeguarding the councilors’ authority. By embedding this power within the Constitution, it might offer a stronger legal shield against any external attempts to undermine that authority. However, the effectiveness of such measures will depend on political will and societal support.
Time.news Editor: You referenced the potential for societal support. How important is public perception in resolving these disputes within the INE?
Dr. Mariana Ruiz: Public perception is crucial. The INE’s credibility relies heavily on trust. If citizens believe the INE operates independently and fairly, it emboldens the institution. Conversely, if citizens feel that political interference is rampant, it undermines the electoral process and democracy itself.
Time.news Editor: Taddei mentioned that disagreements are normal in democratic institutions and that resolutions can be reached. Given the political landscape in Mexico, do you think the INE can navigate these internal conflicts successfully?
Dr. Mariana Ruiz: Navigating such conflicts will indeed require skill, diplomacy, and a commitment to democratic principles. It’s not uncommon for electoral bodies to face tumultuous times, especially when political pressures mount. The key will be whether the councilors can engage in constructive dialogue and whether Taddei can foster a cohesive environment for that dialogue to occur.
Time.news Editor: That makes sense. Let’s consider the upcoming implications of these controversies on upcoming elections. How might this internal strife affect voter sentiment and participation?
Dr. Mariana Ruiz: Internal conflicts within the INE could lead to voter disenchantment. If citizens perceive that the electoral body is struggling with its own governance, they may question the integrity of the electoral process, potentially leading to lower participation rates. It is crucial that the INE maintains a clear and united front to bolster public confidence ahead of elections.
Time.news Editor: Thank you, Dr. Ruiz. It’s evident that the situation at the INE will require careful management moving forward. Last thoughts, how can we expect the public and the political class to play a role in this?
Dr. Mariana Ruiz: Activism and advocacy will be essential. Civil society must remain vigilant and engaged, demanding transparency and accountability. Meanwhile, the political class must recognize the importance of a robust electoral institution for the health of democracy in Mexico. It’s a shared responsibility.
Time.news Editor: Wise words indeed. Thank you so much for your insights, Dr. Mariana Ruiz. It’s been enlightening discussing this vital topic with you today.
Dr. Mariana Ruiz: Thank you for having me! It’s crucial that we continue these conversations as democracy evolves in our country.