He currently works as head of the Conflict Management Unit, is part of Boric’s close circle and was involved in a money mess when he was treasurer of Convergencia Social (CS).
After the explosion Monsalve case, New background information on the complaint has come to light and new details have been revealed regarding the reaction of the different officials who became aware of the situation before the accusation was presented to the Prosecutor’s Office.
one of them was Camilo Aranedawho serves as head of the Conflict Management Unit in the Government and that he would have a close friendship with President Gabriel Boric.
The interior advisor who would have dissuaded the victim from speaking with the Minister of Women before filing a complaint
Under this context, said official would have convinced the complainant of Manuel Monsalve not to contact the Minister of Women, Antonia Orellana, and advised her to It will take a few days to “think it over”.
The above was confirmed by the version that the victim’s father gave to the prosecutors in the case,to whom he assured that his daughter told him that “she told the person in charge of the conflict,named Camilo Araneda,who works inside the Palacio de The Coin,which he also told him everything that happened to him and this person kind of lowered his profile.My daughter told me that she told Camilo that she was planning to talk to the Minister of Women, but he replied that it was better to get a medical license so that she could think about it carefully.“.
In this scenario, The Clinic agreed to the statement of Camilo Araneda, who maintained that the victim told him about this situation a week before he made the complaint, with the intention of seeking guidance.
“(After the conversation) We entered the Palace together, requesting me through a promise not to tell anyone what she revealed to me, as well as not to do anything about it. Facts that until now I have just made present before this statement,” he explained.
According to his version, Araneda declared to prosecutors that the only proposal he gave to the victim was that asked for medical leave, since she had asked him not to divulge his story to anyone.
Camilo Araneda, 38-year-old sociologist, works as head of the Conflict Management unit of the Interior Government Divisiona body dependent on the ministry of the Interior. For performing duties in this position, he receives a gross monthly remuneration of $3.863.712.
The professional joined this division as an expert after Boric’s victory in 2021, with whom he also has a close bond of friendship and with whom he shared activism in Social Convergence (SC).
In the extinct party, in 2020 Araneda served as finance manager. Though, this management was the target of questions. In fact, Meganoticias revealed that the Electoral service (Servel) sent CS a report in which $43 million were challenged that were not duly justified in the balance of 2021, when the party was led by Alondra Arellanoformer candidate for deputy for district 14. After the arrival of parliamentarian Diego Ibáñez to the board, it was decided that the funds would be restored and an internal inquiry would be initiated.
Subsequently, the supreme court of that party decided to suspend his militancy, like two other leaders, which was extended until after the merger of the coalition.
Inside the government, camilo Araneda He is part of Gabriel Boric’s closest circlewhere the majority is linked to Magallanes, where the president comes from.
Also in this group are the journalist Felipe Valenzuela (strategic communication advisor), the history graduate Emiliano Salvo (legislative advisor of Carolina Tohá) and the lawyer Maximiliano Proaño (undersecretary of the Environment).
According to La Tercera, Camilo Araneda frequently participates in barbecues and other social events organized by the “Magallanic” group.
What are the ethical considerations in conflict management within government settings?
Interview Between Time.news Editor and Conflict Management Expert
Editor: Welcome to Time.news! Today we have the pleasure of speaking with Dr. Laura Mendoza, an expert in conflict management and organizational behavior. Dr. Mendoza, thank you for joining us.
Dr. Mendoza: Thank you for having me. it’s a pleasure to be here.
Editor: Recently, the Monsalve case has brought notable attention to the dynamics within the government, especially regarding the interactions of officials like Camilo Araneda, the head of the Conflict Management Unit. Could you provide some insights into the role of conflict management in such sensitive situations?
Dr. Mendoza: Absolutely. Conflict management is essential in any organization but becomes even more critical in governmental contexts where public trust and morale can be significantly impacted. Individuals in conflict management roles, like Camilo Araneda, are expected to assess situations carefully and navigate the emotional and professional implications of each issue.
Editor: There are reports suggesting Araneda dissuaded the victim from contacting the Minister of Women, advising her to “think it over.” What’s your take on this kind of intervention?
Dr. Mendoza: Intervening in that manner raises serious ethical questions. While it’s significant to encourage individuals to take their time and reflect on their decisions, advising someone not to seek support from an appropriate authority can be problematic.It can create a power imbalance and may inadvertently silence a victim’s voice, which is counterproductive to conflict resolution.
Editor: That’s an critically important distinction. In this case, Araneda is described as having a close relationship with President Gabriel Boric. How does the closeness of personal relationships influence conflict management in a political environment?
Dr. Mendoza: Personal relationships can significantly impact decision-making processes. When individuals operate within a close-knit circle, there can be a tendency to prioritize loyalty over openness and accountability. In conflict situations, this might lead to decisions that are more about protecting the relationship or the image of the parties involved then about addressing the core issues fairly and effectively.
Editor: Given these dynamics, what should be the appropriate response from officials when faced with similar allegations?
Dr. Mendoza: It’s crucial for officials to prioritize transparency and accountability. They should facilitate access to appropriate channels for victims to express their concerns without the fear of retribution or influence from those in power. Training in conflict management and crisis communication can also help officials navigate these sensitive situations more effectively.
Editor: Would you say that the Monsalve case could have broader implications for how conflict management is approached in governments?
Dr. Mendoza: Definitely. This case highlights the need for robust systems that allow for obvious reporting and conflict resolution. It could serve as a wake-up call for government entities to reevaluate their conflict management strategies and ensure they are genuinely supportive of victims while upholding ethical standards.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Mendoza, for your insights today. It’s clear that effective conflict management is critical in sensitive situations like the Monsalve case, and your expertise sheds light on the complexities involved.
Dr. Mendoza: Thank you for having me. It’s essential that we continue these discussions around conflict in government to help foster a more accountable and supportive environment for all.
Editor: and thank you to our readers for tuning in to this important conversation. Stay informed with Time.news for more updates and insights on current events.