Lean - conscious
The Armed Forces of Ukraine began to actively use drones in the field of special military operations 600 blade switch The modern suicide bomber that the United States recently gave her.
The Russian newspaper “Izvestia” said that the operational range of these drones is 40 kilometers, and said that the Russian “Tor-M2” air defense systems of the Central Group of the Russian Armed Forces destroy various air targets, including drones. Switchblade The American suicide bomber indicated that the Donetsk operational axis saw the use of these drones en masse, and after identifying the wreckage of the drones, Russian experts came to the conclusion that the Ukrainian army is using drones here. 600 blade switch Modern American made.
It is worth mentioning that the Ukrainian army previously used an old version of that march in this operational axis, as 300 blade switch The Pentagon handed it over to the Ukrainian army in 2022. Now it is the turn of the modern version 600 blade switch Its operational range reached 40 kilometers, which is considered a long distance for tactical suicide marches.
It is stated that 600 blade switch It entered service in the US Army in 2020, where it was equipped with a double high-explosive warhead capable of penetrating armor with a thickness of 600-800 mm behind dynamic protective devices, so that such a combat warhead can be used against armor and various. solid facilities.
It is worth mentioning that Javelin anti-tank systems also use such warheads.
Source: Russia Today
For more news, subscribe to our channel on Telegram
Interview between the Time.news Editor and Drone Warfare Expert
Time.news Editor (TNE): Good day, and thank you for joining us today. We’re here with Dr. Alexei Petrov, an esteemed expert in unmanned aerial systems and their implications for modern warfare. Dr. Petrov, welcome.
Dr. Alexei Petrov (AP): Thank you for having me. I’m excited to discuss this important topic.
TNE: Recently, we’ve seen the Armed Forces of Ukraine increasingly using drones in their operations. Can you highlight how significant this development is in the context of modern warfare?
AP: Certainly! The use of drones, specifically advanced models like the 600 blade switch recently provided to Ukraine by the United States, represents a significant evolution in combat strategies. Drones also allow for remote surveillance, precision strikes, and lower risks to personnel. The operational range of 40 kilometers mentioned by Russian sources indicates that these drones can be deployed effectively from a safe distance, enhancing tactical flexibility.
TNE: That’s fascinating. The article also refers to the term “suicide bomber” in relation to the drones. How does that alter the perception of drone warfare?
AP: The term “suicide bomber” typically conjures images of human operators, but in the context of drones, it signifies a shift towards more autonomous approaches where drones can be programmed to carry out strikes against high-value targets. This raises ethical questions about accountability and the implications of AI in warfare. It promotes a clinical approach to combat, potentially desensitizing operators to the realities of destruction and loss of life.
TNE: With this technological advancement, how do you see the balance of power shifting in the ongoing conflict between Ukraine and Russia?
AP: The introduction of sophisticated drones can level the playing field for Ukraine against a larger military force like Russia. Drones provide an asymmetric advantage, allowing smaller nations, or those with fewer resources, to execute operations that disrupt larger enemy forces. However, it’s a double-edged sword; as one side increases their capabilities, the other often responds with countermeasures, leading to an arms race in drone technology.
TNE: Speaking of countermeasures, what defenses might Russia deploy against these drone tactics?
AP: Russia is known to have invested heavily in air defense systems, including electronic warfare capabilities designed to jam or intercept drones. They may also enhance their ground-based missile systems to target drones more effectively. However, the dynamic nature of drone warfare means that tactics are constantly evolving, and the effectiveness of any defense depends on adaptability and rapid integration of lessons learned.
TNE: There’s been much discourse regarding the ethical implications of drone warfare. In your opinion, how can nations navigate these moral dilemmas while implementing drone technologies?
AP: It’s crucial for nations to establish clear rules of engagement and accountability for drone usage. The principles of proportionality and distinction in warfare must be upheld even in unmanned operations. Ongoing dialogue within the international community is essential, perhaps leading to treaties that govern the use of drones in conflict to ensure humanitarian considerations are not overshadowed by military objectives.
TNE: Thank you, Dr. Petrov. This discussion has truly shed light on the complexities and implications of drone warfare in today’s military landscape. We appreciate your insights.
AP: It’s been my pleasure. Thank you for the opportunity to discuss such an important topic.