The UNNA organization spoke out against the decriminalization of abortion in CDMX. According to them, Morena’s initiative presented in the capital’s Congress did not take into account medical implications.
To Onofre Zenil, surgeon and doctor Jose Raygozaan expert in Hospital Administration, an abortion after 12 weeks and even up to the ninth month of pregnancy, as proposed by the initiative of the local Morena representative, Yuriri Ayala Zuñiga, is senseless and even worrying because it means that medical personnel must accept taking the life of the baby in the womb, with the implicit risk of also endangering the life of the mother.
According to medical specialists, the initiative that aims to expand the scope of abortion in Mexico City not only increases the risks of medical complications, but also exposes women to emotional health risks and possible consequences in future pregnancies, such as premature births due to abortions in advanced stages of pregnancy.
The organization mentioned that attention must be paid to maternal health, maternal-child health, education, employment, economy and individual development.
they mentioned that the Morena deputies decided not to give way to arguments related to the baby’s suffering, and despite the evidence they did not recognize risks, fetal pain, and a failed maternal mortality policy.
Related
Interview: An Insightful Discussion on Abortion Decriminalization in CDMX with Dr. Jose Raygoza
Q: Thank you for joining us, Dr. Raygoza. The UNNA organization recently expressed their opposition to the decriminalization of abortion in Mexico City. Can you explain their main concerns?
A: Certainly. The UNNA organization has raised significant concerns regarding the decriminalization initiative put forth by Morena representatives, particularly highlighting the medical implications. Their stance is that the initiative does not adequately consider the potential health risks involved in performing abortions at advanced stages of pregnancy, up to nine months in some cases. This is troubling from both a medical and ethical standpoint.
Q: What are some of the risks associated with performing abortions after 12 weeks, as proposed in the initiative?
A: There are various serious risks involved. Performing abortions later in pregnancy can lead to increased medical complications, including severe physical and emotional consequences for women. Medical specialists warn that these procedures could inadvertently endanger the mother’s life, as well as the baby’s, leading to issues such as premature birth in subsequent pregnancies. The implications of such a decision extend beyond immediate health risks and affect overall maternal and child health.
Q: The initiative has faced criticisms regarding the issue of fetal pain and maternal mortality policies. Could you elaborate on this?
A: Yes, the failure to address fetal pain in late-term abortions is a critical concern. The debate should encompass the experience of the unborn child and the psychological impact on mothers undergoing these procedures. Despite presenting evidence from medical research on fetal pain and maternal health risks, the Morena deputies have been dismissive. This lack of acknowledgment can lead to an ineffective maternal mortality strategy and further endanger women’s health.
Q: The UNNA organization suggests focusing on other areas such as maternal health, education, and employment. Why are these factors significant in this discussion?
A: These areas are interconnected with reproductive health. Ensuring robust maternal and child health services is essential and should include comprehensive education about reproductive choices and support systems for women. Additionally, economic stability plays a vital role in empowering women to make informed decisions about their health. If we increase focus on these aspects, we could potentially reduce the need for abortions and support women in a more holistic manner.
Q: What practical advice would you offer to readers concerned about the implications of this initiative?
A: I encourage readers to stay informed and advocate for policies that prioritize maternal and child health rather than those that could lead to increased risks. Engaging with local health organizations, participating in public discussions, and supporting educational programs on reproductive health are essential steps. It’s crucial to foster an environment where women’s health is prioritized with evidence-based policies reflective of both modern medical practices and ethical considerations.
Q: In closing, how do you see the current debate over abortion in CDMX impacting future policies?
A: The ongoing debate is pivotal for shaping future reproductive health policies in Mexico City and potentially across the country. It highlights the need for a balanced approach that considers medical realities and ethical implications. If discussions continue to be driven by thorough medical insight and respect for women’s comprehensive health, we may see more responsible and effective legislation in the future.
Q: Thank you, Dr. Raygoza, for your thoughtful insights on this important issue.
A: Thank you for having me. It’s essential to keep the dialogue open and informed for the benefit of our community.