Russian President Vladimir Putin confirmed on Monday that Russian forces took control of 189 towns in Ukraine during the current year, noting that new military-political alliances are being established around the world at the initiative of the United States of America due to the outbreak of conflicts. in some countries around the world.
Putin said at a press conference, broadcast by Al Jazeera, and later by the (INA): “The number of American forces in Europe is more than 100,000,” noting that “the American administration and the West trying to impose a strategic strategy. loss to us and they are providing money and weapons to the Kiev regime.”
He explained,”US plans to deploy medium-range precision missiles are a cause for concern,as the US continues to pump arms and money into the illegitimate Ukrainian regime,fueling the escalation of the conflict.”
The Russian President warned, “If the United States continues to try to spread its weapons in some regions, we will have to take additional measures to ensure our security,” stressing that “Russian forces holding the strategic initiative along the front line in Ukraine.”
He revealed that “the percentage of modern weapons in Russia’s strategic nuclear forces has reached 95%, and we will continue to preserve the capabilities of the strategic nuclear arsenal,” emphasizing saying, “Russia will not let drag herself into an army at the expense of her social and economic situation.”
He pointed out that NATO countries are increasing their military spending and strengthening their combat units near Russia’s borders,indicating that NATO’s ambitions have long exceeded the limits of the alliance’s ancient area of duty.
the Russian President said: “We abandon our voluntary restrictions on the deployment of medium and short-range nuclear missiles if Washington begins to deploy nuclear missiles of the same type.”
He pointed out that “the number of Russian armed forces has increased to 1.5 million soldiers,” stressing that “during the current year, Russian forces took control of 189 Ukrainian towns.”
The Russian President predicted that “there are great possibilities for conflicts to break out in several regions of the world, and new military-political alliances are being established around the world at the initiative of the United States.”
For more news, subscribe to our channel on Telegram
What are the potential repercussions of Russia’s territorial gains in Ukraine for Eastern European security?
Interview: Evaluating Putin’s Recent Statements on Ukraine and Global Military dynamics
Editor, Time.news: Today, we delve into the implications of Russian President Vladimir Putin’s recent remarks regarding Ukraine and the shifting landscapes of military alliances. We are joined by Dr.Elena Vostrikov, a geopolitical analyst specializing in Eastern European conflicts. Thank you for being here, Dr. Vostrikov.
Q: Dr. Vostrikov, President Putin announced that russian forces have taken control of 189 towns in Ukraine this year. What does this signify for the ongoing conflict?
A: Putin’s assertion is a clear indication of Russia’s strategic advances in Ukraine. Securing such territories strengthens Russia’s bargaining position and potentially complicates diplomatic negotiations. This expansion also reflects an escalation in military operations, leading to more entrenched hostilities in the region. It could provoke further international sanctions against Russia, considerably affecting global economic stability.
Q: he also discussed the heightened military presence of the U.S. in Europe, stating there are over 100,000 American forces stationed there. How does this impact NATO-Russian relations?
A: The increased U.S. military presence in Europe underscores the West’s commitment to deterring Russian aggression. Though, it together escalates tensions between NATO and Russia, with the potential for miscalculations or confrontations. This situation exemplifies how alliances are being tested and can lead to an arms race, especially in terms of medium-range precision missiles, which Putin already expressed concern over.
Q: Speaking of missiles, Putin warned that Russia would respond if the U.S. deployed medium-range nuclear missiles in Europe.What does this mean for global security?
A: Putin’s warning signals a pivotal moment in nuclear strategy and global security. If the U.S. proceeds with deployment, it could lead to a destabilizing arms buildup in Europe, prompting Russia to abandon its voluntary restrictions on nuclear missile deployments. This creates a potential flashpoint in international relations, possibly rekindling Cold War-era tension levels, which could endanger peace efforts globally.
Q: He mentioned that NATO countries are increasing military spending. What long-term implications might this have on European security dynamics?
A: The uptick in NATO member states’ military expenditure reflects a collective strategic shift towards a stronger defensive posture against perceived threats from Russia. This could lead to an enhanced military capability within europe; however,it might also deepen the security dilemma,where increased military capabilities from one side trigger countermeasures from the other. This could foster an habitat conducive to conflict rather than stability.
Q: Putin also claimed that new military-political alliances are emerging due to U.S. initiatives. What might these alliances look like?
A: Emerging military-political alliances could potentially reshape global power structures. Countries feeling threatened by U.S. hegemony might seek closer ties with Russia or other non-western powers, leading to a multi-polar world.This shift could also affect regions like the Middle East and Africa, where conflicts might invite greater foreign intervention and collaboration with Russia or China to counter U.S. influence.
Q: with Russia’s military strength reportedly at 1.5 million soldiers and advanced weaponry at 95% modern status, how can the world prepare for potential conflicts?
A: Global preparedness should focus on diplomatic engagement and conflict de-escalation strategies.It’s essential for countries to reinvigorate dialogues around arms control and share intelligence to prevent misunderstandings. Additionally, fostering alliances built on cooperation rather than confrontation could mitigate the risk of a larger conflict, shifting focus towards peaceful resolutions in hotspots around the world.
Editor, Time.news: Thank you, dr. Vostrikov, for your insights into these pressing issues. It’s crucial we continue to monitor how these developments unfold and their implications for international relations and security.