The president of the Russian Federation, Vladimir Putinapproved an update on its nuclear doctrine; the doctrine considers the use of a nuclear attack ante conventional aggression.
This Tuesday, the Russian president approved an update to his nuclear doctrine document that apparently will no longer have a deterrent policy.
You may be interested: Russia accuses Ukraine of attacking with American missiles
According to the document, the decision to use nuclear weapons in necessary cases will be made personally by Putin and in the event that the integrity of the country is threatened, the doctrine authorizes a nuclear attack.
According to the updated document, it will be considered a “joint attack” if a nuclear power country supports another that lacks atomic weapons; This policy has remained afloat since last September.
The document, published on the official portal of the Russian State, states that “The aggression of any State belonging to a military coalition against the Russian Federation or allies (Belarus) will be seen as joint aggression.”
Since last October, Putin has condemned and pointed out the actions of the West in the Ukrainian War and through speeches to the media he has expressed that Russia may resort to the use of nuclear weapons in the event of a war. critical threat to the country’s sovereignty.
The European country can also resort to the use of atomic weapons in the event of a massive attack by Western allies, such as the use of airplanes, cruise missiles, infantry, drones and other types of conventional weapons typical of an invasion. .
Related
What are the potential global security risks associated with Russia’s updated nuclear doctrine?
Time.news Interview: The Implications of Russia’s Updated Nuclear Doctrine
Editor: Welcome, everyone, to Time.news. Today, we have a significant topic on our hands as we delve into the recently approved update to Russia’s nuclear doctrine by President Vladimir Putin. Joining us is Dr. Alexei Volkov, a leading expert in international security and nuclear policy. Dr. Volkov, thank you for being here.
Dr. Volkov: Thank you for having me. It’s a pleasure to be here.
Editor: Let’s jump right in. The new update to Russia’s nuclear doctrine states that a nuclear attack may be considered in response to conventional aggression. Can you explain what this means for international relations?
Dr. Volkov: Certainly. This change indicates a significant shift in Russia’s military strategy. Historically, nuclear weapons were viewed as a deterrent to discourage attacks, but this policy implies a readiness to use nuclear force preemptively if Russia perceives itself to be under conventional threat. This could escalate tensions not just with the West but also within its neighboring regions.
Editor: So, you’re saying that this could lead to a new type of nuclear arms race?
Dr. Volkov: Exactly. If states perceive a shift in Russia’s willingness to employ nuclear weapons in defense of conventional threats, we might see increased investment in conventional military capabilities, as well as advancements in missile defense systems. Countries may feel compelled to bolster their own arsenals or establish new alliances for collective defense. This could destabilize existing geopolitical norms.
Editor: How do you think this affects NATO and its member states?
Dr. Volkov: For NATO, this update creates a more complex security scenario. Member states may need to revisit their defense strategies and policies regarding nuclear deterrence. It could push NATO to enhance its eastern flank defenses or even rethink the positioning of nuclear weapons in Europe to reassure member countries and deter any aggressive moves from Russia. However, it’s a delicate balance, as increasing military posture can also provoke further escalation.
Editor: Speaking of escalation, what do you think is the risk of miscalculation between nuclear powers given this new doctrine?
Dr. Volkov: The risk is significant. In a high-stakes environment where both conventional and nuclear forces confront each other, misunderstandings can easily occur. If a country misjudges the intent behind military exercises or troop movements, it might respond with force that could spiral into broader conflict. This is especially concerning with the rise of cyber capabilities, which can further muddy the waters of attribution and responsibility.
Editor: Dr. Volkov, what should the international community do in response to this policy change?
Dr. Volkov: A renewed commitment to arms control agreements is essential. Dialogue is crucial; nations must engage in discussions around nuclear policies to avoid escalation. Additionally, creating robust communication channels between military leaders to prevent misunderstandings and miscalculations will be imperative. Lastly, global powers should work toward a framework that addresses not just nuclear weapons but also conventional forces—promoting stability in both realms.
Editor: It sounds like there’s a lot of work that needs to be done. As we wrap up, what is your biggest concern regarding this update to Russia’s nuclear doctrine?
Dr. Volkov: My biggest concern is the normalization of nuclear weapon use as a viable option in conflict scenarios. The more countries see nuclear weapons as a legitimate tool of warfare, the closer we get to a world where they could be used, which would have catastrophic consequences. It is essential for the sake of global security to reinforce the message that nuclear weapons should remain a last resort under all circumstances.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Volkov, for your insights on this critical issue. It’s clear that the implications of this updated nuclear doctrine will be felt far and wide, and your expertise helps us understand its many facets. We appreciate your time today.
Dr. Volkov: Thank you for the discussion. It’s vitally important we keep these conversations going.
Editor: And thank you to our viewers for joining us. Stay tuned for more updates on this developing story at Time.news.