ukraine demanded a public apology from the International Football Federation (FIFA) as of a map shown during the draw for the World Cup 2026 qualifiers,that the Crimean peninsula is not part of the country’s territory,DPA reported.
On Friday, during the live TV draw, a map was revealed showing the countries that could not play against each other for political reasons. In the image, Crimea was not included in the borders of Ukraine.
Russia annexed the Ukrainian peninsula in 2014.- an act condemned by the international community and not recognized until today.
“you not only acted in violation of international law, but also supported Russian propaganda, war crimes and criminal aggression against Ukraine,” wrote the spokesman of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Ukraine Giorgi tyhi in a publication in X. D’ He demanded a public apology from FIFA. (BTA)
What was the reaction of the international community to FIFA’s handling of the World Cup 2026 qualifiers map incident?
Interview: Ukraine Demands Apology from FIFA Over World Cup 2026 Qualifiers Map Incident
Editor of Time.news (E): Today, we have with us Dr. Alexei Ivkin, an expert in international relations and sports diplomacy, to discuss the recent controversy surrounding FIFA’s World Cup 2026 qualifiers draw, particularly the depiction of Crimea on the map. Thank you for joining us, Dr. Ivkin.
Dr. Alexei Ivkin (A): Thank you for having me. It’s crucial to address these issues, especially given their diplomatic implications.
E: To start, can you explain what led to Ukraine’s demand for a public apology from FIFA?
A: Certainly. During the recent live draw for the World Cup 2026 qualifiers, a map displayed by FIFA did not recognize Crimea as part of Ukraine’s territory. This oversight is significant, as it contradicts Ukraine’s sovereignty, particularly following Russia’s annexation of the peninsula in 2014—a move condemned by the international community. Ukraine’s ministry of Foreign Affairs made it clear that FIFA’s actions could be perceived as supporting Russian propaganda and aggression.
E: How does this situation reflect on FIFA’s responsibility in international affairs?
A: FIFA, as a global governing body for football, also holds a position of influence in international relations. By failing to represent the geopolitical realities of its member nations, FIFA risks alienating significant portions of its audience and undermining the principles it stands for, such as inclusivity and fairness. The organization must be aware that its actions can have far-reaching consequences beyond the football pitch.
E: What are the potential impacts of this controversy on the upcoming World Cup qualifiers?
A: The implications can be severe. If FIFA does not address Ukraine’s concerns, it could strain relationships not just with Ukraine but with other countries that oppose Russia’s actions. this unrest may lead to protests or boycotts during the qualifiers, which might disrupt the tournament’s atmosphere. Additionally, FIFA risks facing backlash from sponsors and international entities that prioritize human rights and respect for sovereignty.
E: What can FIFA do to rectify this situation moving forward?
A: A public apology, as demanded by Ukraine, would be a step in the right direction. FIFA shoudl also consider establishing clearer guidelines for representing political and territorial concerns in future events.Engaging in dialog with affected countries and advisory boards that understand international law could help FIFA navigate these sensitive issues better.
E: For our readers who are passionate about football and global affairs, what practical advice can you give regarding advocacy in international sports?
A: It’s essential for fans and stakeholders to engage with sports organizations on issues of portrayal and fairness. Supporting campaigns that promote awareness of international law and human rights can aid in creating an environment where sports can foster peace and understanding. Fans can also participate in discussions and raise public consciousness through social media to ensure that their voices are heard.
E: Thank you, dr. Ivkin,for your insights on this critical issue affecting international sports.It’s clear that the intersection of sports and diplomacy requires careful navigation.
A: Thank you for the opportunity. It’s vital that we continue to discuss and advocate for the integrity of international sports, recognizing their role in a broader geopolitical context.
E: This has been an enlightening discussion. We appreciate your time and expertise.