in what cases can an agent be dismissed?

by time news

2024-04-10 19:26:30

In 2023, out of 2.5 million agents, only thirteen were dismissed for “professional inadequacy” and 222 for disciplinary reasons. ty / stock.adobe.com

In 2022, only 13 dismissals for professional inadequacy and 222 for disciplinary reasons were pronounced among 2.5 million state civil service agents.

Ready to cut the Gordian knot, Stanislas Guerini calls for «lift the taboo of dismissal in the public service » in order to strengthen its “efficiency”. In the columns of Parisian the minister bangs his fist on the table. “There has been a culture of avoidance on these subjects for too long”he exclaims, pointing layoff figures in the state civil service (prefectural ministries, educational establishments). “It is a misuse of the status of the civil service to consider that in the name of guaranteeing employment, we cannot separate ourselves from an agent who does not do his job”, he adds. If the minister intends to facilitate entry and exit from the civil service, what are the reasons today that can force a civil servant to leave? Le Figaro takes stock.

Unlike private sector personnel, the situation of civil servants is not governed by a contract: civil servants are placed under a public law regime. Their status, enshrined in the general civil service code (CGFP), is determined by law and regulation. Reputed to be indestructible once established, civil service agents enjoy a “guarantee obliging the administration to find the civil servant a job corresponding to his grade in the event of abolition of his post”specifies the site public-life. However, it is “totally wrong” to believe that a civil servant has his job guaranteed for life, says Mylène Jacquot, general secretary of the Union of federations of civil servants and equivalents of the CFDT (UFFA-CDFT).

“Professional inadequacy, an arbitrary notion”

There are in fact several reasons why the employer can unilaterally end the career of a civil servant. Already, professional inadequacy or disciplinary reasons and other professional misconduct, as mentioned by the Minister of Transformation and the Public Service. The first is a device “very poorly defined and above all extremely poorly applied”, judged the minister on France Inter. In 2022, out of 2.5 million state civil servants, only thirteen have been laid off for “professional inadequacy” and 222 for disciplinary reasons, according to the General Directorate of Administration and Civil Service.

It is also “a procedure which is partly based on arbitrariness, not on clearly established facts as in the case of dismissal for professional misconduct”castigates Olivier Bouis, the deputy secretary general of the General Federation of Force Officials (FGF-FO). “The notion of insufficiency does not require a fault but personal appreciation, which is the opposite of the idea behind the general status of civil servants which is to counter arbitrariness”he adds.

Furthermore, the article L553-1 of the CGFP also mentions the abandonment of position and the refusal of three positions of the same grade. “Civil servants can also be removed from the ranks (ie, removed from the lists of civil servants) for incapacity, a fairly common phenomenon in the hospital or even territorial civil service”, adds Mylène Jacquot. Before adding that “the only cause of dismissal that does not exist is economic dismissal”. During a dismissal, the joint administrative commission (half made up of staff representatives) must be contacted for all reasons for dismissal. “Except in the event of professional inadequacy which requires compliance with the disciplinary procedure”specifies the UFFA-CDFT.

According to the data of the General Directorate of Civil Service Administration, 3,351 sanctions were imposed in 2022 against a state civil service agent, or approximately one agent in 746 sanctioned. Most of the faults concerned incorrectness, violence and insults or moral harassment, or negligence, hierarchical disobedience, irregular absences or abandonment of posts, representing more than half of the total. These actions were mainly punished by warnings, reprimands, and more rarely temporary exclusions from functions or revocations.

If the figures for 2022 may seem low, particularly the number of dismissals for professional inadequacy, the unions surveyed prefer to see this “a source of satisfaction”. “The low number shows that recruitment is rather well done and that in the event of difficulties (often one-off and explainable), they are accompanied and resolved rather than punished”, says Mylène Jacquot. Same story with FGF-FO. For Olivier Bouis, “There is no reason why a civil servant should not be able to do his job. The entrance exams are difficult, the levels of agent graduates are often higher than the requirements of the positions and upon admission, they are additionally trained for the mission..


data-script=”
>

#cases #agent #dismissed

You may also like

Leave a Comment