The spokesman of the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, Ali Mohammad Naeini, confirmed today, Saturday, that Iran will use the element of surprise in its operations against the Zionists, saying that the entity will not be able to extrapolate the actions of Iran .
Naini said in a statement carried by the (INA): “The Zionist entity is sure that Iran will respond to the military operations at exactly the same level, and this is what the Netanyahu government wants,” adding pointed out that “Operation True Promise proved that Iran is not ready to play at the level the Zionists expect.
He said that “Iran is able to change the attitude of the enemy according to Tehran’s strategy of controlling and punishing those who attack Iran’s national security, and the truth is that Operation True Promise 2 was the beginning of the process surprise the Zionists.”
Naini said that “Iran will use the element of surprise in its operations against the Zionists, and will show that the entity will not be able to extrapolate Iran’s actions,” noting that “Operation True Promise showed, despite the possession of be at the entity occupied on different. technologies and weapons and boasting of its defense shield and its allies, it was unable to defend itself against missile attacks from Iran.
He added, “The most important thing in their mathematical error is that the Zionist entity believes that Iran is afraid of direct confrontation and military war and will leave the question of the recent attacks unanswered,” explaining that “the Zionists have a wrong assumption that the Iranian people are tired of resistance and public opinion in Iran does not welcome war with Iran.” The entity, and this way of thinking of the Zionist regime is communication with the opposition media abroad and the owners of sabotage projects, and this is certainly one of the examples of the miscalculation of the Zionist entity.”
He continued: “Iran’s first and second Operation Real Commitment clearly demonstrated that Iran is not afraid of direct confrontation or a military response to the Zionist aggression, and at the same time declares that it will use its power and its military equipment well. to punish the aggressor.”
For more news, subscribe to our channel on Telegram
Interview Between Time.news Editor and Military Analyst Dr. Farah Zaman
Time.news Editor: Good afternoon, Dr. Zaman. Thank you for joining us today. Recent statements from Iranian Revolutionary Guard spokesman Ali Mohammad Naeini have stirred significant discussion regarding Iran’s military strategies. He emphasized the element of surprise in Iran’s operations against Israel. What do you make of this assertion?
Dr. Zaman: Good afternoon, and thank you for having me. Naeini’s comments highlight a key aspect of modern military strategy—unpredictability. The idea that Iran can change its operational tactics to catch its adversary off guard is not new, but it indicates a shift in how Iran perceives its geopolitical landscape, especially in relation to Israel.
Time.news Editor: He mentioned that the “Zionist entity” is operating under an assumption that Iran will retaliate at the same level as previous conflicts. In your view, what implications does this have for Israel’s military strategy moving forward?
Dr. Zaman: This speaks volumes about Israel’s strategic calculations. If Iran is indeed capable of surprising Israel, it necessitates a reevaluation of their intelligence and operational frameworks. Israel has traditionally relied on its intelligence superiority; however, the assertion that Iran’s response can diverge significantly from past reactions suggests that Israel may need to adopt a more flexible and adaptive military posture.
Time.news Editor: Naeini also mentioned “Operation True Promise,” which he claims demonstrated Iran’s ability to adapt beyond Israeli expectations. How should we interpret this recent operation in the context of Iran’s broader military tactics?
Dr. Zaman: “Operation True Promise” appears to be a demonstration of asymmetric warfare, where Iran shows its capability to respond in unconventional ways. The emphasis on changing tactics could suggest that Iran is investing in technological advancements and guerrilla tactics rather than traditional force-on-force confrontations. This might serve as a deterrent while simultaneously sending a message about Iran’s commitment to its strategic objective of regional influence.
Time.news Editor: Given the context of these statements, what are the potential risks for both Iran and Israel if this strategic uncertainty continues?
Dr. Zaman: The uncertainty creates a precarious environment for both sides. For Israel, the risk lies in miscalculating Iran’s responses and possibly facing an unexpected escalation. For Iran, there’s the danger of overextending its military ambitions and provoking a response that unites its adversaries. Both countries are navigating a complex web of alliances and enmities. Continuous uncertainty could lead to heightened tensions and potentially catastrophic miscalculations.
Time.news Editor: what should the international community be on the lookout for in the coming months given these developments?
Dr. Zaman: The international community should monitor not just military developments but also diplomatic efforts—or the lack thereof—between Iran and other regional players. Increased military posturing from either side could signal a build-up towards conflict. Additionally, alliances may shift as nations assess their interests in the face of Iranian unpredictability. It’s a delicate balance that could change rapidly with any significant incident.
Time.news Editor: Thank you, Dr. Zaman, for your insights. It’s clear that the evolving dynamics in this region will require ongoing analysis and understanding. We appreciate your time today.
Dr. Zaman: Thank you for having me. It’s always a pleasure to engage in such critical discussions.