The war between Russia and Ukraine comes to your day 999 since its beginning on February 24, 2022, when the Russian president Vladimir Putin ordered a “special military operation” to free the pro-Russian population from the Donbas region of Ukraine.
Hoy Monday, November 18, 2024after the alleged authorization by the United States of the use of ATACMS missiles to Ukraine on Russian territory, las reactions faced with a possible World War III They have not been long in coming.
Despite this, at At least ten people, including seven police officers and a health worker, died this Monday in Odessa in a Russian missile attack against a residential area of the city, according to the Ukrainian Police in a statement.
The Ukrainian president, Volodímir Zelenskihas condemned the Russian attack on Odessa on his social networks.
“Strike by Russian terrorists with a ballistic missile against Odessa, against a residential area,” Zelensky wrote on his Telegram channel.
According to the Ukrainian president, the missile landed in a park and caused damage to a residential building, a university and an administrative building.
Zelensky added that it was not “an accidental attack” and described the bombing as “exemplary.”
“After the calls and meetings with Putin, after all these words in the media about his supposed ‘resignation’ from the attacks, Russia “shows what it is really interested in: only war,” Zelensky said in reference to the calls that the president-elect of the United States had had in recent days with the Russian president, Donald Trumpand the German chancellor, Olaf Scholz.
Zelensky asked the leaders who participate in Brazil in the G20 summit what “listen” to the message that Putin’s attack sends.
The broad daylight attack on Odessa comes hours after another Russian missile killed 11 people in the northeastern Ukrainian city of Sumi last night.
During the early hours of Sunday, Russian forces destroyed Ukrainian electrical infrastructure with one of the most massive attacks of this war, in which 120 missiles and 90 drones were used.
Russia Ukraine War: France allows kyiv to use its weapons on Russian territory
France already allows Ukraine to use the weapons it supplies against Russian bases from where attacks are launched against Ukrainian soil.Elysée sources recalled this Monday.
Following reports that the president of the United States, Joe Biden has decided to allow Ukraine to fire long-range US-made missiles against targets on Russian soilthe French presidency pointed out that Paris already allows the use of military equipment sent to kyivalthough only against targets from which Ukrainians are attacked.
President Emmanuel Macron defined this new policy during his state visit to Germany at the end of May, in a speech after receiving the Westphalian International Peace Prize in the city of Meseberg.
“I think we should allow them (the Ukrainians) to neutralize the military bases from which missiles are fired and, basically, the military sites from which Ukraine is attacked, but we should not
France supplies Ukraine with SCALP long-range cruise missilesequal to those Storm Shadow that he The United Kingdom also supplies kyiv, with a maximum range of about a thousand kilometers.
The announcement of the delivery of these missiles was announced by Macron at the Vilnius NATO summit in July 2023.
Last May in Germany emphasized that “an escalation” with Moscow was not sought and that this authorization did not imply“since it is Russia itself that is acting in the same way.”
“How do we explain to Ukrainians that they have to protect their cities (…) if we tell them: we give you weapons but you can’t defend yourself?” he insisted.
Multiple reactions to World War III due to Russia Ukraine war
After the assumption announcement of the Joe Biden government’s authorization to Ukraine of ATACMS missiles in Russian territory las speculations of a World War III They resonate louder in the world.
Even in the transition of power in the United Statespeople close to President-elect Donald Trump have shown their concern and They blame the Biden administration for wanting to provoke a Third World War.
The next US health official, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. published a severe accusation on his official X account, stating that “anonymous men with laces who currently direct the foreign policy of the United States apparently want start World War III before leaving the White House.”
The leader of this country allied with Russia, Kim Jong-un has accused the West of provoking and fueling the war in Ukraine to expand “are military interventionism to the entire world” in a speech given to the Army in addition to the possibility of breaking out a Third World War.
“As US war mongers continue to provide military support to Ukraine and Israel, more countries are caught in the war and the international security situation becomes more dangerous, raising anxiety that a war could break out. third world war
Kim Jong-un, in a long speech published today by the state news agency KCNA
On the other hand, also accused to the military alliance between South Korea, Japan and the United States of being a factor capital that threatens peace and stability in the Asia-Pacific and the Korean Peninsula by carrying out joint military maneuvers and deploying strategic weapons, and considered that the three are seeking to form an “Asian NATO” while dragging members of the Atlantic Alliance and other allies to the region.
Faced with these accusations, Kim considered it necessary to continue strengthening national defense in the face of the possibility of a conflict breaking out, always in mind.
Vladimir Putin gives Kim-Jong a luxury car (EFE)
How can diplomatic efforts be strengthened to prevent escalation in the Ukraine-Russia war?
Interview: The Consequences of Escalation in the Ukraine-Russia Conflict
Editor (Time.news): Good morning, Dr. Anderson. Thank you for joining us today to discuss the latest developments in the ongoing war between Russia and Ukraine, which has now reached day 999. With the recent authorization of ATACMS missiles for Ukraine, the international community is buzzing with concerns about escalating tensions. What’s your take on this situation?
Dr. Anderson (Expert on International Relations): Good morning! It’s a pleasure to be here. The situation is indeed precarious. The U.S. decision to allow Ukraine to strike targets within Russia represents a significant escalation in the conflict. It not only complicates the military dynamic but raises fears of broader repercussions, potentially involving NATO in a more direct way.
Editor: Yes, and we’ve already seen tragic outcomes with recent missile attacks in Odessa and Sumi, claiming the lives of civilians. How do these attacks fit into the larger strategy of the war?
Dr. Anderson: These attacks highlight a grim reality of this conflict. Russia has consistently targeted civilian infrastructure to instill fear and disrupt normalcy in Ukraine. The missile strike in Odessa, in particular, underscores the Kremlin’s unwillingness to back down despite international condemnation. President Zelensky’s condemnation of these attacks reflects a deep frustration and resolve to counter such aggression, but the cycle of violence is troubling.
Editor: Zelensky has been vocal about wanting world leaders to ‘listen’ to the messages behind these Russian aggressions. What impact do you think this has on Ukraine’s relationships with its allies?
Dr. Anderson: Zelensky’s appeals are crucial. They serve to rally international support, emphasizing the need for a united front against Russian aggression. However, there’s also a tension emerging. While allies like France have already allowed Ukraine to use weapons against Russian positions, there’s a fine line between supporting Ukraine’s self-defense and escalating into a full-blown conflict that could draw in additional powers. The challenge for Ukraine is to maintain support without crossing thresholds that would provoke a wider war.
Editor: Recently, the rhetoric regarding a potential World War III has grown louder, especially following Biden’s comments. How significant is this fear, and what does it reveal about current geopolitical tensions?
Dr. Anderson: The fears of World War III are reflective of a significant shift in global geopolitics. As states choose sides, the risk of miscalculations increases. The comments from figures close to the incoming government, accusing Biden’s administration of provocations, suggest there is a growing partisan divide on how to approach Russia. The rhetoric from North Korean leader Kim Jong-un further complicates matters, implying that this conflict is now being viewed through an ideological lens that could align or divide multiple countries in unprecedented ways.
Editor: Given this backdrop, what steps do you think the international community should take to mitigate the risk of further escalation?
Dr. Anderson: Diplomacy is essential. It’s crucial for all nations involved to re-engage in dialogue and consider how to de-escalate tensions. Humanitarian efforts, along with support for peace negotiations, are equally important. Additionally, setting clear boundaries for military engagement can help prevent unintended escalations. The key is balancing support for Ukraine while preventing any actions that might push Russia into a corner, leading to desperate and dangerous decisions.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Anderson, for sharing your insights. The complexities of this conflict are indeed daunting, but understanding the geopolitical implications is crucial as we look ahead.
Dr. Anderson: Thank you for having me. It’s vital that we continue to have these conversations as the situation evolves. The implications extend far beyond Ukraine and Russia, impacting global stability.
Editor: Absolutely. Let’s hope for a peaceful resolution soon. Thank you again for joining us.