The president, Claudia Sheinbaum announced the name of the five people who will make up the Evaluation Committee of the Executive Branch for the election in the Judicial Branch, and the former minister of the Supreme Court, Arturo Zaldivar will be part of this.
It is worth mentioning that, the Evaluation Committee is responsible for carrying out the review of the files of the applicants, as well as evaluating compliance with the constitutional and legal requirements to identify the best evaluated people.
You might be interested in: Xóchitl Gálvez recognizes the dignity of judges who declined to participate in the election
The Committee is made up of three women and two men: Mary Cruz Cortés Ornelas; Javier Quijano Baz; Vanessa Romero Rocha; Isabel Inés Romero Cruz; and Arturo Fernando Zaldívar Lelo de Larrea, current General Coordinator of Policy and Government of the Government of the Republic.
Lawyer Vanessa Romero Rocha has two master’s degrees in different branches of law, as well as experience in culture of peace, gender inclusion and children’s rights She is also a communist and collaborator in national and international media.
Also, Mary Cruz Cortés Ornelas is a lawyer and teacher in electoral law, titular magistrate of the third presentation and president of the criminal chamber of the Superior Court of Justice of the State of Tlaxcala director of evaluation and monitoring of the criminal justice system in Tlaxcala, spokesperson for the new criminal justice system in the State.
You might be interested in: PAN denounces that the Evaluation Committee for candidates for judges “is a farce”
The law graduate, Isabel Inés Romero Cruz is the presiding judge of the Superior Court of Justice and the Judicial Council of the State of Veracruz.
Lawyer Javier Quijano Baz has a master’s degree and doctorate in law, is a prominent member of various national and international bars and associations of lawyers, a candidate lawyer, and served as a constituent of Mexico City.
For his part, Arturo Zaldívar was Chief Justice of the Supreme Court and has a master’s degree and doctorate in Law, at the same time he has stood out as an academic and public servant.
Meanwhile, the Committee will issue its rules of operation and functioning, which guarantees its independence and impartiality, at the same time it will enjoy full autonomy for its internal organization and will have support to achieve its purposes, and will be extinguished once they have been fulfilled.
MC
Related
Interview Between the Time.news Editor and Legal Expert
Editor: Good morning, and welcome to another insightful segment of Time.news. Today, we are diving into an important development in Mexico’s judicial landscape. We’re joined by legal expert Dr. Laura Mendoza, who specializes in constitutional law and the interplay between government branches. Thank you for joining us, Dr. Mendoza!
Dr. Mendoza: Good morning! Thank you for having me. It’s a pleasure to discuss such a significant topic.
Editor: Let’s jump right in. Claudia Sheinbaum has announced the members of the newly formed Evaluation Committee for the Judicial Branch election. What do you think about this step towards enhancing the integrity of the judiciary?
Dr. Mendoza: This is a crucial move. The Evaluation Committee plays a pivotal role in ensuring that candidates for judicial positions not only meet constitutional requirements but also uphold the highest standards of ethics and professionalism. The inclusion of credible figures like Arturo Zaldívar, the former Supreme Court Minister, brings a wealth of experience to the committee which could greatly benefit the evaluation process.
Editor: It’s interesting that the committee consists of three women and two men. What does this gender balance signify in the context of this evaluation process?
Dr. Mendoza: The gender balance is a progressive step in promoting inclusivity and equality within the judiciary. Women have historically been underrepresented in legal and judicial roles, so this decision signals a recognition of the importance of diverse perspectives. It could enhance the evaluation process by incorporating insights that resonate with various segments of society.
Editor: Vanessa Romero Rocha, a member of the committee, has a strong background in gender inclusion and children’s rights, among other areas. How do her qualifications enrich the committee’s work?
Dr. Mendoza: Vanessa’s expertise is invaluable. Her experience in gender inclusion can guide the evaluation of candidates from a lens that prioritizes not just legal qualifications but also social justice and equity. This focus can lead to selecting judges who are not only knowledgeable about the law but also empathetic and attuned to the rights and needs of diverse populations. It’s an essential perspective in today’s society.
Editor: The committee has the responsibility to review applicants thoroughly. How important is this process for the legitimacy of the judicial system?
Dr. Mendoza: Thorough evaluations are fundamental to maintaining the legitimacy of the judicial system. By ensuring that only qualified candidates who transcend mere legal competence are chosen, the committee helps safeguard public confidence in the judiciary. It’s about building trust that judges will be fair, just, and competent.
Editor: Some groups, like the judges who declined to participate, have raised concerns. How do you see their role and perspective in this context?
Dr. Mendoza: The dissenting voices should be taken seriously. Their concerns might reflect fears about political influence in judicial appointments or skepticism about the committee’s impartiality. Engaging with these judges and understanding their reservations can promote transparency and help the selection process to be viewed as fair by all stakeholders.
Editor: As we look ahead, what do you believe could be the long-term impact of this evaluation committee on Mexico’s judicial system?
Dr. Mendoza: If managed correctly, this committee can set a precedent for future judicial appointments, emphasizing strict compliance with constitutional standards. It can help cultivate a legal culture resistant to corruption and partiality, ultimately leading to a stronger rule of law and a more effective judicial system in Mexico.
Editor: Thank you, Dr. Mendoza, for sharing your insights with us today. It’s clear that this new Evaluation Committee holds great potential for shaping a more equitable judicial system in Mexico.
Dr. Mendoza: Thank you for having me! I look forward to seeing how this unfolds and its implications for the future.
Editor: Stay tuned for more updates on this story as it develops at Time.news!