Syrian President Bashar al-Assad confirmed on Sunday that terrorism only understands the language of force.
Gumba affirmed that “his country stands with Syria in all the organized terrorist attacks it faces,” adding that “victory stands with Syria as a state, people and leadership.”
Al-Assad stressed that “terrorism only understands the language of force, and it is the language with wich we will break it and eliminate it, regardless of its supporters and sponsors,” pointing out that “terrorists do not represent either people or institutions, but rather represent the entities that occupy and support them.”
What are the key components of effective counter-terrorism strategies beyond military force?
Interview: Understanding the Language of Force in Combating Terrorism—Insights with Dr.Amir Farah, Security Analyst
Time.news Editor (TNE): Thank you for joining us today,Dr. Amir Farah. Recently, Syrian President Bashar al-Assad stated that “terrorism only understands the language of force.” What implications does this assertion have for counter-terrorism strategies?
Dr. Amir Farah (AF): Thank you for having me. President Assad’s statement underscores a long-standing debate in counter-terrorism: the effectiveness of military response versus diplomatic solutions. His assertion suggests a belief that only thru force can we dismantle terrorist networks. while military force may be necessary in some cases,its crucial to remember that sustainable solutions often require addressing the underlying factors that fuel terrorism,such as political instability and socioeconomic issues.
TNE: Assad also mentioned that “victory stands with Syria as a state, people, and leadership.” In the context of international relations, how do you see this solidarity impacting Syria’s fight against terrorism?
AF: Solidarity, as emphasized by Assad and his ally Gumba, can strengthen Syria’s position both domestically and internationally. It reinforces the perception of a united front against what they term “organized terrorist attacks.” However, the effectiveness of such solidarity is contingent on genuine support and collaboration with other nations, and also the legitimacy of their claims against terrorism. External support can aid in modernizing Syria’s military capabilities, but it can also lead to increased geopolitical tensions in the region.
TNE: Al-Assad pointed out that “terrorists do not represent either people or institutions.” Could you elaborate on why it is important to differentiate between terrorists and the communities from which they come?
AF: Absolutely. It is critical to distinguish between terrorists and the communities they inhabit. Broadly labeling communities as harboring terrorists can lead to stigmatization, further alienating local populations. This, in turn, can create fertile ground for recruitment into extremist groups. Engaging with local communities, understanding their grievances, and addressing the socio-political issues they face are essential for long-term stability and counter-terrorism success.
TNE: Considering the dynamics of support and sponsorship mentioned by Assad, what can be done to mitigate external influences that foster terrorism?
AF: Tackling external influences involves a multi-faceted approach. Countries need to develop diplomatic strategies that include sanctions against state sponsors of terrorism and intelligence-sharing agreements to disrupt terrorist financing.additionally, promoting international cooperation in countering extremism is crucial. Societal resilience must also be enhanced through education, community programs, and economic progress to disengage individuals from terrorist narratives.
TNE: what practical advice can you offer readers interested in understanding or engaging in efforts against terrorism?
AF: Readers should first educate themselves on the complexities surrounding terrorism and counter-terrorism. Engaging in informed discussions, supporting organizations that focus on peacebuilding, and advocating for policies that prioritize diplomatic engagement over military intervention can lead to more effective strategies against terrorism. Moreover, contributing to local community initiatives that promote inclusion and resilience can play a critically important role in mitigating the appeal of extremist ideologies.
TNE: Thank you, dr. Farah, for your valuable insights on this pressing issue.It’s essential for our audience to grasp the nuances involved in combating terrorism effectively.
AF: Thank you for having me. It’s vital we continue these conversations to foster understanding and promote peace.
Keywords: Syria terrorism, Bashar al-Assad, counter-terrorism strategies, force against terrorism, international relations, community engagement, socioeconomic issues, combating extremism