TRIBUNE — The last two years have shown that the medical community weighs a considerable weight on the destiny of peoples and the political decisions of States. Lockdowns have been costly and obviously detrimental. However, new therapies are to be evaluated with caution after enthusiasm and pressure exerted in favor of a very questionable all-vaccine. However, doctors have ordered, directed to silence their opponents on television sets. And caution is still not in order.
Right now, the World Health Organization (WHO) is staging a global coup to concentrate all power in its hands. Like the recent declaration of Doctor Fauci claiming all powers, without having to justify itself before any assembly, the WHO continues its conquest of power with complete impunity. Its latest proposals concerning its power to prescribe the conduct to be followed by States are clear, so much so that Poland contests this attack on the sovereignty of States. The institution would decide and the States would comply. Global biopower is therefore taking hold in the name of health prevention of pandemics. Isolate, vaccinate, impose preventive therapy, dictate behavior, organize isolation camps, etc.
Also read: Military documents contradict Anthony Fauci’s sworn testimony
Only, all this is not the fruit of an opportunity. It is the result of an old reflection. The biopower project has been known since 1935. We have forgotten too much about this forecast and its motivations. Alexis Carrel (1873-1944), Nobel Prize in Medicine in 1912 for his work on vascular suturing and transplantation of blood cells and organs publishes “The man, this stranger”, which achieved considerable success from its publication in 1935, published in many languages until the 1950s. It is in the last chapter of this book that we already find the full description of the biopower project.
Alexis Carrel affirms that medicine needs institutions that will allow it to carry out its projects. It is not anecdotal to point out that medical research aims for something other than simple scientific progress, but the mastery of a body of knowledge for political purposes. He writes :
“The Rockefeller Institute has undertaken the exploration of a wider field. Along with the agents producing diseases and their effects on animals and humans, it analyzes the physical, chemical, physico-chemical and physiological activities manifested by the body. In the laboratories of the future this research will advance much further. The whole man belongs to the domain of biological research. Of course, each specialist must freely continue the exploration of his own district. But it is important that no important aspect of the human being be ignored. The method employed by Simon Flexner in the direction of the Rockefeller Institute could profitably be extended to the biological and medical institutes of tomorrow. At the Rockefeller Institute, the living matter is studied in a very comprehensive way from the structure of its molecules to that of the human body.However, in the organization of this vast research, Flexner did not impose any program to the members of his Institute. He contented himself with choosing scholars who had a natural taste for exploring these different territories. One could by an analogous process organize laboratories intended for the study of all the psychological and social activities of man, as well as of his chemical and organic functions.” (230, IV)
Beyond this institution, he calls for the high council, which would sit above all the other institutions to inspire them, to command them. By legitimizing the potential power of medicine and the progress it can achieve:
“The creation of such an institution would constitute an event of great social importance. This center of thought would be composed, like the Supreme Court of the United States, of a very small number of men. It would perpetuate itself indefinitely, and his ideas would always remain young. Democratic leaders, as well as dictators, could draw from this source of scientific truth the information they need to develop a truly human civilization.” (231, IV)
He makes it clear that human life is to be directed in the name of the government of bodies and minds. The politician does not have the competence, the doctor yes. It goes further in the expression of the ambition of a power exercised by these scholars who would lead the world. He imagines the institution of a legitimate medical power to command the future of humanity:
“These scholars should be given a position as high, as free from political intrigue and publicity as that of the members of the Supreme Court. Constitution. For they would have the body and soul of a great race in its tragic struggle against the blind sciences of matter.” (232, IV)
Biopower is potentially becoming a legitimate dictatorship in the eyes of its inspirer. This legitimacy is due to a conception of politics where it is a question of reigning above all over humans, much more than over territories. There, Doctor Carrel’s messianism is manifest. He writes :
“An ascetic and mystical minority would quickly acquire an irresistible power over the pleasure-loving and blinded majority. It would be able, by persuasion or perhaps by force, to impose other forms of life upon it.” (234, V)
He already claims impunity for the exercise of this power, exercising without limit in the name of his knowledge, holder of the truth about life, the good life and death. In this regard, Doctor Fauci is the direct heir to this claim of omnipotence, answerable to no one:
“These scholars should be given a position as high, as free from political intrigue and publicity as that of the members of the Supreme Court. Constitution. For they would have the body and soul of a great race in its tragic struggle against the blind sciences of matter.” (232, IV)
These doctor-tyrants would therefore no longer listen to the patient, would not hear anything that would contradict their decision. A world without complaint, without questioning. How can we in the third millennium fantasize such power when scientific knowledge has nothing to do with truth or freedom. Science does not know what is good or bad, there is its limit. It is temporary, falsifiable. Who has forgotten that Newton’s gravity, effective in engineering sciences, is quite false with regard to relativity, which will also be contested, falsified, even if it allows interaction with phenomena. Between what we know of the limits of science since the crisis of contemporary mathematics and physics, how can we reasonably support this scientistic delirium? Moreover, medicine is even less a science, but an art at the crossroads of several sciences. These doctors therefore speculate on anxieties, the fear of death and suffering to the point of wanting to govern bodies, deciding who should be born and die, even how to produce new men, transplants, microchips, etc. It is time to put the scientific spirit in its place except to pour into scientistic ideology. It was the character trait of Communism and Nazism to claim to speak the truth in the name of a theory of history or a theory of races reputed to be unfailingly true.
Read also: Vaccination against Sars-CoV-2: the abuse of mathematics harms the complexity of living things
It is simply urgent to teach the philosophy of science, critical thinking and to develop a sense of freedom by opening up to other dimensions than just scientific and technical knowledge.