2024-04-28 01:24:20
In the Purge casethe theory of the State Attorney General’s Office is that the former legislator of the Social Christian Party (PSC)Pablo M., accused as the author, would be the “leader of a criminal group” who negotiated and settled judicial resolutions in the Court of Justice of Guayas to obtain economic and material benefits.
Furthermore, it would have operated through a troll center on social networks to harm the adversaries of the criminal organization.
One of these benefits would be the sentence from which the former legislator would have benefited. A million-dollar comprehensive repair of almost $4 million obtained through you have data against him Bank of Pacific. Both judges Reinaldo C., Johann M. and Guillermo V., as well as the plaintiffs, Pablo M. and his wife, from this judicial process alone are in preventive detention in the Purga case.
The lawyer Ricardo Noboa has been part of the technical defense of the banking entity, since March 22, 2023, and says that as soon as he began to exercise it, he encountered a series of attacks and insults on social networks, but that he never thought that it could be “a conspiracy.”
“When I saw on social networks that they responded to me in this way, I naturally always thought that this was from some specific people, friends of Mr. Muentes, related and as often happens, they respond to certain types of comments on Twitter. But I never imagined this conspiracy,” he says.
Noboa mentions that after learning the first indications of the Purga case, he did not imagine that his personal security “could be at risk because there was a conspiracy against the bank, but also against the bank’s technical defense.”
The jurist also maintains that if the former legislator “had been an ordinary citizen, he would not have been able to achieve what he achieved.”
“He is a person who takes advantage of the status he held as an assembly member and an important person – someone mentioned that he was the de facto block head of the PSC in the Assembly – if he had not had these perks, it is very difficult for a citizen to be able to do everything this macabre montage that he has done.”
Noboa has not been called to give his version in the framework of the Purga case investigation and believes that in his capacity as the bank’s technical defender his work is limited.
“But if they call me tomorrow, I will say what I have to say. The only thing I know about the case itself is what refers to Banco del Pacífico, and during all this time we have seen in amazement everything that was being achieved in an irregular manner.” (I)