EDITO — As Louis Pasteur might have said: between the Antis and the Haves, the battle is raging. To which I venture to add: Today more than ever! »
With particular regard to the health pass, between an “Anti” and a “Have”, it is not – it is no longer – only a question of “N”; this fierce hatred of the second towards the first. It has now become a matter of survival for him.
Let me explain.
Those who should indeed be called the “haves” of information are the speakers, politicians, self-proclaimed experts and so-called journalists who, in the media mainstream, deliver and/or support a single version of thought. The official version. The version that the power in place wants to impose as indisputable truth. The short truth.
Starting from this observation, which is unfortunately 100% well and truly obvious, these participants have materially operated, in France, a pledge of the media space.
I say “ materially because here is the legal definition of “ pledge » : « The pledge is conventional security. »
And article 2072 of the Civil Code determines more precisely that “ the pledging of a movable thing is called a pledge. Also, pledge is the general name given to securities relating to movable property.
However, this total control that the members of the power in place are working to have on the official truth, which they thus want to impose on the citizens as being the truth in short; this stranglehold consists, alas, entirely of a security, a guarantee placed on the media space which allows them both to block information and to prevent the substantive debate required by the constitutional principle of freedom of expression in order to have a “real truth”.
Oh yes ! With all due respect to the Haves: When the truth is not free, the freedom is not true », as Jacques Prévert said.
Hence, moreover, the downright visceral nature of this fierce hatred shown by the “Haves” towards the “Antis” (while the “Antis” are only asking for respect for their fundamental rights to freely dispose of their body, a real asymmetry of treatment or discrimination vis-à-vis free and informed consent).
Why ?
Because, like a rift in a fortification, a rift the assailant can step into and turn the tide in his favor—however tiny—truth needs only a tiny space. for, at a more or less long term, always end up imposing oneself on the lie.
This is the reason why, for any official truth that it knows is actually a lie, the power in place needs to completely lock down the media space, if it wants to be able to impose this lie on the people as being the truth. .
And it is even unfailingly the manifest element of fact as far as possible, “ calling out I would say (“ Hear! Hear citizens! “), to recognize for sure a state lie.
Therefore, my dear compatriots, be vigilant.